❓ Question seeks clarification on conflicting statements regarding C-series train seats: their fitness for purpose vs. the government's commitment to replace them. The answer refers the questioner to a previous answer.
AnsweredQoN 594Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the Minister's answer to Estimates pre-hearing questions in relation to C-series passenger seats, stating "the seats are fit-for-purpose and comply with all required safety standards. Feedback regarding some ergonomic elements cannot be actioned due to crashworthiness requirements", and I ask: (a) how does this answer align with the Government's commitment to replace the passenger seats on the C-series trains?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
14 October 2025
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Transport
Response time
4 days
(a) I refer the Member to the answer given to Legislative Council Question on Notice 585.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.