❓ Question regarding correspondence from a residents' group about the Subiaco China Green redevelopment, discrepancies between the original and current plans, and community consultation. The Minister refers to a previous answer.
AnsweredQoN 6217Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(a) the Minister; and
(b) the Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA),
received correspondence from a residents’ association styling itself as the Subiaco China Green Action Group?
(2) When was the correspondence received and when will it be responded to?
(3) Is it true that the SRA is now pursuing a plan for Subiaco China Green that is radically different from the 2004 concept plan?
(4) What are the essential differences between the two plans?
(5) Is it the truth that the honouring of the original plan was a condition of the sale of land by the Subiaco City Council to the SRA?
(6) Now that the Minister is aware of the strength of opposition from local residents to the SRA’s current development plans (which vary dramatically from those originally agreed), will she direct the SRA to cease implementation of the latest plans, pending consultation with the community and Subiaco City Council?
(7) If no to (6), why not?
(b) the Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (SRA),
received correspondence from a residents’ association styling itself as the Subiaco China Green Action Group?
(2) When was the correspondence received and when will it be responded to?
(3) Is it true that the SRA is now pursuing a plan for Subiaco China Green that is radically different from the 2004 concept plan?
(4) What are the essential differences between the two plans?
(5) Is it the truth that the honouring of the original plan was a condition of the sale of land by the Subiaco City Council to the SRA?
(6) Now that the Minister is aware of the strength of opposition from local residents to the SRA’s current development plans (which vary dramatically from those originally agreed), will she direct the SRA to cease implementation of the latest plans, pending consultation with the community and Subiaco City Council?
(7) If no to (6), why not?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
3 June 2008
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Response time
55 days
These matters were dealt with in the answer supplied to Legislatve Council Question without Notice 359.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.