❓ A parliamentary question regarding the relocation of the Perth Museum, specifically concerning the heritage significance of the proposed East Perth site versus the existing Cultural Centre site. The Minister's response indicates that both sites were considered equally, previous studies were reviewed, and the Heritage Council was consulted.
AnsweredQoN 352Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
MUSEUM — RELOCATION
I refer to the new Perth Museum site. (1) What comparative analysis was conducted of the heritage significance of the proposed East Perth Museum site and the current cultural centre site? (2) Were the heritage studies that had been previously conducted of the cultural centre museum buildings and site reviewed? (3) Was the Heritage Council asked to review the relative merits of the alternative sites; and, if not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA
I refer to the new Perth Museum site. (1) What comparative analysis was conducted of the heritage significance of the proposed East Perth Museum site and the current cultural centre site? (2) Were the heritage studies that had been previously conducted of the cultural centre museum buildings and site reviewed? (3) Was the Heritage Council asked to review the relative merits of the alternative sites; and, if not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer — (1) Both sites were considered equally for their heritage significance. (2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
(1) What comparative analysis was conducted of the heritage significance of the proposed East Perth Museum site and the current cultural centre site? (2) Were the heritage studies that had been previously conducted of the cultural centre museum buildings and site reviewed? (3) Was the Heritage Council asked to review the relative merits of the alternative sites; and, if not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer — (1) Both sites were considered equally for their heritage significance. (2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
(2) Were the heritage studies that had been previously conducted of the cultural centre museum buildings and site reviewed? (3) Was the Heritage Council asked to review the relative merits of the alternative sites; and, if not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer — (1) Both sites were considered equally for their heritage significance. (2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
(3) Was the Heritage Council asked to review the relative merits of the alternative sites; and, if not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer — (1) Both sites were considered equally for their heritage significance. (2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer — (1) Both sites were considered equally for their heritage significance. (2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer — (1) Both sites were considered equally for their heritage significance. (2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
(1) Both sites were considered equally for their heritage significance. (2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
(2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
(3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
(1) What comparative analysis was conducted of the heritage significance of the proposed East Perth Museum site and the current cultural centre site? (2) Were the heritage studies that had been previously conducted of the cultural centre museum buildings and site reviewed? (3) Was the Heritage Council asked to review the relative merits of the alternative sites; and, if not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer — (1) Both sites were considered equally for their heritage significance. (2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
(2) Were the heritage studies that had been previously conducted of the cultural centre museum buildings and site reviewed? (3) Was the Heritage Council asked to review the relative merits of the alternative sites; and, if not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer — (1) Both sites were considered equally for their heritage significance. (2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
(3) Was the Heritage Council asked to review the relative merits of the alternative sites; and, if not, why not? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer — (1) Both sites were considered equally for their heritage significance. (2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer — (1) Both sites were considered equally for their heritage significance. (2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer — (1) Both sites were considered equally for their heritage significance. (2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
(1) Both sites were considered equally for their heritage significance. (2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
(2) Yes. (3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
(3) Yes; the Heritage Council provided input and advice according to its policies and procedures.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.