❓ A WA parliamentary question seeks details about the Office of Multicultural Interests' 'Inclusion and Integration Grants Program', including application numbers, recommendations, approvals, and reasons for decisions. The response provides some information but cites confidentiality for not disclosing unsuccessful applicants.
AnsweredQoN 1717Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(1) How many grant applications did the Office of Multicultural Interests receive for its ‘Inclusion and Integration Grants Program’?
(2) How many applications did the Office of Multicultural Interests recommend for the Minister’s approval, and –
(a) who were the recommended recipients; and
(b) for what purpose were the grants recommended?
(3) How many of those applications in (2) did the Minister approve –
(a) who were the recipients; and
(b) for what purpose were the grants provided?
(4) How many of the applications for the ‘Inclusion and Integration Grants Program’ did the Office of Multicultural Interests not recommend to the Minister?
(5) Did the Minister approve any of the applications not recommended to him in (4), and if so –
(a) who were the recipients;
(b) for what purpose were the grants provided; and
(c) what were the Minister’s reasons for approving these applications?
(2) How many applications did the Office of Multicultural Interests recommend for the Minister’s approval, and –
(a) who were the recommended recipients; and
(b) for what purpose were the grants recommended?
(3) How many of those applications in (2) did the Minister approve –
(a) who were the recipients; and
(b) for what purpose were the grants provided?
(4) How many of the applications for the ‘Inclusion and Integration Grants Program’ did the Office of Multicultural Interests not recommend to the Minister?
(5) Did the Minister approve any of the applications not recommended to him in (4), and if so –
(a) who were the recipients;
(b) for what purpose were the grants provided; and
(c) what were the Minister’s reasons for approving these applications?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
26 February 2007
Responded by
Minister for Citizenship and Multicultural Interests
Response time
76 days
(b) for what purpose were the grants recommended?
(b) for what purpose were the grants provided?
(b) for what purpose were the grants provided; and (c) what were the Minister’s reasons for approving these applications?
(c) what were the Minister’s reasons for approving these applications?
(2) a & b (3) a & b & (4) None. An independent panel was established to consider the applications and make recommendations to the then Minister for approval, in accordance with the three funding categories set out in the IIGP Guidelines, being Community Based Initiatives, Promoting Interaction and Communication, and Youth Leadership. The then Minister approved nine recommendations and publicly announced the successful grants via media statements on 20 and 21 November 2006. The Minister also made a Ministerial statement to the Legislative Assembly on Tuesday 21 November 2006. Given the confidential nature of the application and assessment process, it is not considered appropriate to release details of applications that were not successful (5) No. (a) - (c) Not applicable.
(3) a & b & (4) None. An independent panel was established to consider the applications and make recommendations to the then Minister for approval, in accordance with the three funding categories set out in the IIGP Guidelines, being Community Based Initiatives, Promoting Interaction and Communication, and Youth Leadership. The then Minister approved nine recommendations and publicly announced the successful grants via media statements on 20 and 21 November 2006. The Minister also made a Ministerial statement to the Legislative Assembly on Tuesday 21 November 2006. Given the confidential nature of the application and assessment process, it is not considered appropriate to release details of applications that were not successful (5) No. (a) - (c) Not applicable.
None. An independent panel was established to consider the applications and make recommendations to the then Minister for approval, in accordance with the three funding categories set out in the IIGP Guidelines, being Community Based Initiatives, Promoting Interaction and Communication, and Youth Leadership. The then Minister approved nine recommendations and publicly announced the successful grants via media statements on 20 and 21 November 2006. The Minister also made a Ministerial statement to the Legislative Assembly on Tuesday 21 November 2006. Given the confidential nature of the application and assessment process, it is not considered appropriate to release details of applications that were not successful (5) No. (a) - (c) Not applicable.
The then Minister approved nine recommendations and publicly announced the successful grants via media statements on 20 and 21 November 2006. The Minister also made a Ministerial statement to the Legislative Assembly on Tuesday 21 November 2006. Given the confidential nature of the application and assessment process, it is not considered appropriate to release details of applications that were not successful (5) No. (a) - (c) Not applicable.
Given the confidential nature of the application and assessment process, it is not considered appropriate to release details of applications that were not successful (5) No. (a) - (c) Not applicable.
(5) No. (a) - (c) Not applicable.
(a) - (c) Not applicable.
(b) for what purpose were the grants provided?
(b) for what purpose were the grants provided; and (c) what were the Minister’s reasons for approving these applications?
(c) what were the Minister’s reasons for approving these applications?
(2) a & b (3) a & b & (4) None. An independent panel was established to consider the applications and make recommendations to the then Minister for approval, in accordance with the three funding categories set out in the IIGP Guidelines, being Community Based Initiatives, Promoting Interaction and Communication, and Youth Leadership. The then Minister approved nine recommendations and publicly announced the successful grants via media statements on 20 and 21 November 2006. The Minister also made a Ministerial statement to the Legislative Assembly on Tuesday 21 November 2006. Given the confidential nature of the application and assessment process, it is not considered appropriate to release details of applications that were not successful (5) No. (a) - (c) Not applicable.
(3) a & b & (4) None. An independent panel was established to consider the applications and make recommendations to the then Minister for approval, in accordance with the three funding categories set out in the IIGP Guidelines, being Community Based Initiatives, Promoting Interaction and Communication, and Youth Leadership. The then Minister approved nine recommendations and publicly announced the successful grants via media statements on 20 and 21 November 2006. The Minister also made a Ministerial statement to the Legislative Assembly on Tuesday 21 November 2006. Given the confidential nature of the application and assessment process, it is not considered appropriate to release details of applications that were not successful (5) No. (a) - (c) Not applicable.
None. An independent panel was established to consider the applications and make recommendations to the then Minister for approval, in accordance with the three funding categories set out in the IIGP Guidelines, being Community Based Initiatives, Promoting Interaction and Communication, and Youth Leadership. The then Minister approved nine recommendations and publicly announced the successful grants via media statements on 20 and 21 November 2006. The Minister also made a Ministerial statement to the Legislative Assembly on Tuesday 21 November 2006. Given the confidential nature of the application and assessment process, it is not considered appropriate to release details of applications that were not successful (5) No. (a) - (c) Not applicable.
The then Minister approved nine recommendations and publicly announced the successful grants via media statements on 20 and 21 November 2006. The Minister also made a Ministerial statement to the Legislative Assembly on Tuesday 21 November 2006. Given the confidential nature of the application and assessment process, it is not considered appropriate to release details of applications that were not successful (5) No. (a) - (c) Not applicable.
Given the confidential nature of the application and assessment process, it is not considered appropriate to release details of applications that were not successful (5) No. (a) - (c) Not applicable.
(5) No. (a) - (c) Not applicable.
(a) - (c) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.