❓ Question regarding actions in 2002 or 2003. Answer states collating and summarising the information would be an unreasonable redirection of resources and could prejudice ongoing matters.
AnsweredQoN 30Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(b) 2002; or (c) 2003?
(c) 2003?
(c) 2003?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
3 May 2005
Responded by
Leader of the House representing the Minister for State Development
Response time
35 days
(2) No, it would represent an unreasonable redirection of resources to collate and summarise all of these actions and, indeed, in many instances legal advice would have to be sought as to whether a "summary" of the case could be published without prejudicing an ongoing matter.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.