A member of parliament questions the Justice Minister about the status of secure perimeter fencing at minimum security facilities, following a government media statement. The Minister responds that the project is not yet finalised.

AnsweredQoN 80Legislative Council
Asked
7 April 2005
Portfolio
Justice

QuestionView source ↗

I refer the minister to a joint media statement from the Premier and the Minister for Justice on Tuesday, 5 April 2005, which in part states - The Government has already . . . moved quickly to install secure perimeter fencing at our two minimum security facilities. (1) Have the tender documents for the fencing been drawn up? (2) If so, will the minister table the tender documents; and, if not, when will the documents be available? (3) How many metres of fencing, for both length and height, will be required for each prison? (4) When will the fences be erected? Hon KIM CHANCE

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2)-(4) This has not yet been finalised and is subject to a detailed site survey, review of options and operational implications.
(2) If so, will the minister table the tender documents; and, if not, when will the documents be available? (3) How many metres of fencing, for both length and height, will be required for each prison? (4) When will the fences be erected? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2)-(4) This has not yet been finalised and is subject to a detailed site survey, review of options and operational implications.
(3) How many metres of fencing, for both length and height, will be required for each prison? (4) When will the fences be erected? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2)-(4) This has not yet been finalised and is subject to a detailed site survey, review of options and operational implications.
(4) When will the fences be erected? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2)-(4) This has not yet been finalised and is subject to a detailed site survey, review of options and operational implications.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2)-(4) This has not yet been finalised and is subject to a detailed site survey, review of options and operational implications.
I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2)-(4) This has not yet been finalised and is subject to a detailed site survey, review of options and operational implications.
(1) No. (2)-(4) This has not yet been finalised and is subject to a detailed site survey, review of options and operational implications.
(2)-(4) This has not yet been finalised and is subject to a detailed site survey, review of options and operational implications.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more