❓ Question on Notice regarding the number and duration of settled, agreed, or withdrawn matters referred to the Employer by the Director, and matters cleared in a specific timeframe. Also, the average time taken to finalise matters.
AnsweredQoN 1644Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) 2000; (c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(e) so far in 2003?
(b) 2000; (c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(e) so far in 2003?
(b) 2000; (c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(e) so far in 2003?
(b) 2000; (c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(e) so far in 2003?
(b) 2 to 4 weeks; (c) 4 to 6 weeks; (d) 6 to 8 weeks; and (e) more than 8 weeks?
(c) 4 to 6 weeks; (d) 6 to 8 weeks; and (e) more than 8 weeks?
(d) 6 to 8 weeks; and (e) more than 8 weeks?
(e) more than 8 weeks?
(c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(e) so far in 2003?
(b) 2000; (c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(e) so far in 2003?
(b) 2000; (c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(e) so far in 2003?
(b) 2000; (c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(c) 2001; (d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(d) 2002; and (e) so far in 2003?
(e) so far in 2003?
(b) 2 to 4 weeks; (c) 4 to 6 weeks; (d) 6 to 8 weeks; and (e) more than 8 weeks?
(c) 4 to 6 weeks; (d) 6 to 8 weeks; and (e) more than 8 weeks?
(d) 6 to 8 weeks; and (e) more than 8 weeks?
(e) more than 8 weeks?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
24 June 2003
Responded by
Minister for Consumer and Employment Protection
Response time
14 days
(2) (a) 17 in 1999 (b) 78 in 2000 (c) 37 in 2001 (d) 19 in 2002 (e) 19 to 31 May 2003 Note The term settled has been interpreted to include all instances where the matter was settled, agreed or withdrawn subsequent to the referral of the matter to the Employer by the Director. (3) (a) 61 in 1999; (b) 1620 in 2000; (c) 514 in 2001; (d) 547 in 2002; and (e) 209 to 31 May 2003 (4) (a) 1 in 1999; (b) 54 in 2000; (c) 26 in 2001; (d) 15 in 2002; and (e) 5 to 31 May 2003 (5) In relation to Item 2: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 2003 (a) Less than 2 weeks 4 1 8 2 4 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 17 4 8 10 6 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 10 4 3 5 0 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 12 4 2 1 0 (e) More than 8 weeks 39 11 7 5 0 In relation to Item 3: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil 9 4 2 1 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 2 23 4 7 3 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 4 31 6 4 2 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 2 27 7 16 4 (e) More than 8 weeks 44 1197 372 257 14 In relation to Item 4: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (b) 2 to 4 weeks 1 Nil Nil 1 Nil (c) 4 to 6 weeks Nil 3 Nil Nil Nil (d) 6 to 8 weeks Nil 1 1 Nil Nil (e) More than 8 weeks Nil 45 19 9 Nil Note: In this question “Cleared in” has been interpreted to mean finalised. (6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
(3) (a) 61 in 1999; (b) 1620 in 2000; (c) 514 in 2001; (d) 547 in 2002; and (e) 209 to 31 May 2003 (4) (a) 1 in 1999; (b) 54 in 2000; (c) 26 in 2001; (d) 15 in 2002; and (e) 5 to 31 May 2003 (5) In relation to Item 2: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 2003 (a) Less than 2 weeks 4 1 8 2 4 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 17 4 8 10 6 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 10 4 3 5 0 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 12 4 2 1 0 (e) More than 8 weeks 39 11 7 5 0 In relation to Item 3: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil 9 4 2 1 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 2 23 4 7 3 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 4 31 6 4 2 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 2 27 7 16 4 (e) More than 8 weeks 44 1197 372 257 14 In relation to Item 4: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (b) 2 to 4 weeks 1 Nil Nil 1 Nil (c) 4 to 6 weeks Nil 3 Nil Nil Nil (d) 6 to 8 weeks Nil 1 1 Nil Nil (e) More than 8 weeks Nil 45 19 9 Nil Note: In this question “Cleared in” has been interpreted to mean finalised. (6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
(4) (a) 1 in 1999; (b) 54 in 2000; (c) 26 in 2001; (d) 15 in 2002; and (e) 5 to 31 May 2003 (5) In relation to Item 2: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 2003 (a) Less than 2 weeks 4 1 8 2 4 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 17 4 8 10 6 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 10 4 3 5 0 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 12 4 2 1 0 (e) More than 8 weeks 39 11 7 5 0 In relation to Item 3: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil 9 4 2 1 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 2 23 4 7 3 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 4 31 6 4 2 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 2 27 7 16 4 (e) More than 8 weeks 44 1197 372 257 14 In relation to Item 4: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (b) 2 to 4 weeks 1 Nil Nil 1 Nil (c) 4 to 6 weeks Nil 3 Nil Nil Nil (d) 6 to 8 weeks Nil 1 1 Nil Nil (e) More than 8 weeks Nil 45 19 9 Nil Note: In this question “Cleared in” has been interpreted to mean finalised. (6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
(5) In relation to Item 2: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 2003 (a) Less than 2 weeks 4 1 8 2 4 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 17 4 8 10 6 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 10 4 3 5 0 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 12 4 2 1 0 (e) More than 8 weeks 39 11 7 5 0 In relation to Item 3: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil 9 4 2 1 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 2 23 4 7 3 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 4 31 6 4 2 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 2 27 7 16 4 (e) More than 8 weeks 44 1197 372 257 14 In relation to Item 4: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (b) 2 to 4 weeks 1 Nil Nil 1 Nil (c) 4 to 6 weeks Nil 3 Nil Nil Nil (d) 6 to 8 weeks Nil 1 1 Nil Nil (e) More than 8 weeks Nil 45 19 9 Nil Note: In this question “Cleared in” has been interpreted to mean finalised. (6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
In relation to Item 3: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil 9 4 2 1 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 2 23 4 7 3 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 4 31 6 4 2 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 2 27 7 16 4 (e) More than 8 weeks 44 1197 372 257 14 In relation to Item 4: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (b) 2 to 4 weeks 1 Nil Nil 1 Nil (c) 4 to 6 weeks Nil 3 Nil Nil Nil (d) 6 to 8 weeks Nil 1 1 Nil Nil (e) More than 8 weeks Nil 45 19 9 Nil Note: In this question “Cleared in” has been interpreted to mean finalised. (6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
In relation to Item 4: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (b) 2 to 4 weeks 1 Nil Nil 1 Nil (c) 4 to 6 weeks Nil 3 Nil Nil Nil (d) 6 to 8 weeks Nil 1 1 Nil Nil (e) More than 8 weeks Nil 45 19 9 Nil Note: In this question “Cleared in” has been interpreted to mean finalised. (6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
Note: In this question “Cleared in” has been interpreted to mean finalised. (6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
(6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
(7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
(3) (a) 61 in 1999; (b) 1620 in 2000; (c) 514 in 2001; (d) 547 in 2002; and (e) 209 to 31 May 2003 (4) (a) 1 in 1999; (b) 54 in 2000; (c) 26 in 2001; (d) 15 in 2002; and (e) 5 to 31 May 2003 (5) In relation to Item 2: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 2003 (a) Less than 2 weeks 4 1 8 2 4 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 17 4 8 10 6 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 10 4 3 5 0 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 12 4 2 1 0 (e) More than 8 weeks 39 11 7 5 0 In relation to Item 3: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil 9 4 2 1 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 2 23 4 7 3 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 4 31 6 4 2 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 2 27 7 16 4 (e) More than 8 weeks 44 1197 372 257 14 In relation to Item 4: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (b) 2 to 4 weeks 1 Nil Nil 1 Nil (c) 4 to 6 weeks Nil 3 Nil Nil Nil (d) 6 to 8 weeks Nil 1 1 Nil Nil (e) More than 8 weeks Nil 45 19 9 Nil Note: In this question “Cleared in” has been interpreted to mean finalised. (6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
(4) (a) 1 in 1999; (b) 54 in 2000; (c) 26 in 2001; (d) 15 in 2002; and (e) 5 to 31 May 2003 (5) In relation to Item 2: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 2003 (a) Less than 2 weeks 4 1 8 2 4 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 17 4 8 10 6 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 10 4 3 5 0 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 12 4 2 1 0 (e) More than 8 weeks 39 11 7 5 0 In relation to Item 3: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil 9 4 2 1 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 2 23 4 7 3 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 4 31 6 4 2 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 2 27 7 16 4 (e) More than 8 weeks 44 1197 372 257 14 In relation to Item 4: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (b) 2 to 4 weeks 1 Nil Nil 1 Nil (c) 4 to 6 weeks Nil 3 Nil Nil Nil (d) 6 to 8 weeks Nil 1 1 Nil Nil (e) More than 8 weeks Nil 45 19 9 Nil Note: In this question “Cleared in” has been interpreted to mean finalised. (6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
(5) In relation to Item 2: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 2003 (a) Less than 2 weeks 4 1 8 2 4 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 17 4 8 10 6 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 10 4 3 5 0 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 12 4 2 1 0 (e) More than 8 weeks 39 11 7 5 0 In relation to Item 3: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil 9 4 2 1 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 2 23 4 7 3 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 4 31 6 4 2 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 2 27 7 16 4 (e) More than 8 weeks 44 1197 372 257 14 In relation to Item 4: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (b) 2 to 4 weeks 1 Nil Nil 1 Nil (c) 4 to 6 weeks Nil 3 Nil Nil Nil (d) 6 to 8 weeks Nil 1 1 Nil Nil (e) More than 8 weeks Nil 45 19 9 Nil Note: In this question “Cleared in” has been interpreted to mean finalised. (6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
In relation to Item 3: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil 9 4 2 1 (b) 2 to 4 weeks 2 23 4 7 3 (c) 4 to 6 weeks 4 31 6 4 2 (d) 6 to 8 weeks 2 27 7 16 4 (e) More than 8 weeks 44 1197 372 257 14 In relation to Item 4: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (b) 2 to 4 weeks 1 Nil Nil 1 Nil (c) 4 to 6 weeks Nil 3 Nil Nil Nil (d) 6 to 8 weeks Nil 1 1 Nil Nil (e) More than 8 weeks Nil 45 19 9 Nil Note: In this question “Cleared in” has been interpreted to mean finalised. (6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
In relation to Item 4: 1999 2000 2001 2002 To 31 May 03 (a) Less than 2 weeks Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (b) 2 to 4 weeks 1 Nil Nil 1 Nil (c) 4 to 6 weeks Nil 3 Nil Nil Nil (d) 6 to 8 weeks Nil 1 1 Nil Nil (e) More than 8 weeks Nil 45 19 9 Nil Note: In this question “Cleared in” has been interpreted to mean finalised. (6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
Note: In this question “Cleared in” has been interpreted to mean finalised. (6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
(6) 481 at 1 May 2003 (7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
(7) 392 Days - The Hon Member should be aware when considering this data that subsequent to the 1999 amendments a number of matters lodged seeking a determination as to the worker’s degree of disability became the subject of Supreme Court Writs. As a result, a significant number of other matters awaiting a determination of the degree of disability were, at the request of the parties, adjourned pending the outcome of those writs. This caused and is still causing lengthy delays in the hearing of matters before the Conciliation & Review Directorate.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.