A Member of Parliament is questioning the Minister for State Development regarding the adequacy of answers provided to a previous Question on Notice, seeking clearer and more direct responses. The Minister deflects, citing Standing Orders.

AnsweredQoN 771Legislative Council
Asked
15 May 2003
Portfolio
State Development

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to question on notice No. 485 of March 11 2003 and the answers provided -
(1) Can the Minister factually explain what does he consider to be relevant and meaningful information to be provided to the member?
(2) If no to (1), why not?
(3) Given that the Minister has not provided a concise yes or no answer and explanation for parts (2) and (3) can the Minister now provide a concise, relevant, free from argument or controversial matter answer to these questions?
(4) If no to (3), why not?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
10 June 2003
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for State Development
Response time
26 days
(2) Not applicable. (3-4) I refer the member to the Standing Orders regarding the asking of questions.
(3-4) I refer the member to the Standing Orders regarding the asking of questions.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more