❓ A WA parliamentary question addresses concerns about boundary fences not being re-erected on cadastral boundaries after sewer line installation by the Water Corporation. The Minister responds, addressing each concern and promising to provide a plan.
AnsweredQoN 412Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to question without notice 39 dated 4 March 2004 and question without notice 152 dated 31 March 2004. (1) Given that the boundary fences at lot 16, No 137 Arlunya Avenue, Cloverdale were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries following the laying of a sewer line by the Western Australian Water Corporation, what action will the Water Corporation take to rectify this situation? (2) Will the minister table a copy of the one to 1 000 scale as-constructed plan in respect of this lot? (3) Is the minister aware that the fences on a number of abutting lots and other nearby lots, which were removed to facilitate the laying of a sewer line, have not been re-erected on the respective cadastral boundaries; and, if so, what action will the Water Corporation take to rectify this situation? Hon KIM CHANCE
AnswerView source ↗
I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. On behalf of the Minister for Government Enterprises, I have divided the answer into three parts as indicated by the paragraphs in the question. (1) The Water Corporation has no evidence to suggest that the fences were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries, or that the fences have not been reconstructed at some stage in the past 20 years. (2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
(1) Given that the boundary fences at lot 16, No 137 Arlunya Avenue, Cloverdale were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries following the laying of a sewer line by the Western Australian Water Corporation, what action will the Water Corporation take to rectify this situation? (2) Will the minister table a copy of the one to 1 000 scale as-constructed plan in respect of this lot? (3) Is the minister aware that the fences on a number of abutting lots and other nearby lots, which were removed to facilitate the laying of a sewer line, have not been re-erected on the respective cadastral boundaries; and, if so, what action will the Water Corporation take to rectify this situation? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. On behalf of the Minister for Government Enterprises, I have divided the answer into three parts as indicated by the paragraphs in the question. (1) The Water Corporation has no evidence to suggest that the fences were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries, or that the fences have not been reconstructed at some stage in the past 20 years. (2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
(2) Will the minister table a copy of the one to 1 000 scale as-constructed plan in respect of this lot? (3) Is the minister aware that the fences on a number of abutting lots and other nearby lots, which were removed to facilitate the laying of a sewer line, have not been re-erected on the respective cadastral boundaries; and, if so, what action will the Water Corporation take to rectify this situation? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. On behalf of the Minister for Government Enterprises, I have divided the answer into three parts as indicated by the paragraphs in the question. (1) The Water Corporation has no evidence to suggest that the fences were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries, or that the fences have not been reconstructed at some stage in the past 20 years. (2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
(3) Is the minister aware that the fences on a number of abutting lots and other nearby lots, which were removed to facilitate the laying of a sewer line, have not been re-erected on the respective cadastral boundaries; and, if so, what action will the Water Corporation take to rectify this situation? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. On behalf of the Minister for Government Enterprises, I have divided the answer into three parts as indicated by the paragraphs in the question. (1) The Water Corporation has no evidence to suggest that the fences were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries, or that the fences have not been reconstructed at some stage in the past 20 years. (2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. On behalf of the Minister for Government Enterprises, I have divided the answer into three parts as indicated by the paragraphs in the question. (1) The Water Corporation has no evidence to suggest that the fences were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries, or that the fences have not been reconstructed at some stage in the past 20 years. (2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. On behalf of the Minister for Government Enterprises, I have divided the answer into three parts as indicated by the paragraphs in the question. (1) The Water Corporation has no evidence to suggest that the fences were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries, or that the fences have not been reconstructed at some stage in the past 20 years. (2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
(1) The Water Corporation has no evidence to suggest that the fences were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries, or that the fences have not been reconstructed at some stage in the past 20 years. (2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
(2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
(3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
(1) Given that the boundary fences at lot 16, No 137 Arlunya Avenue, Cloverdale were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries following the laying of a sewer line by the Western Australian Water Corporation, what action will the Water Corporation take to rectify this situation? (2) Will the minister table a copy of the one to 1 000 scale as-constructed plan in respect of this lot? (3) Is the minister aware that the fences on a number of abutting lots and other nearby lots, which were removed to facilitate the laying of a sewer line, have not been re-erected on the respective cadastral boundaries; and, if so, what action will the Water Corporation take to rectify this situation? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. On behalf of the Minister for Government Enterprises, I have divided the answer into three parts as indicated by the paragraphs in the question. (1) The Water Corporation has no evidence to suggest that the fences were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries, or that the fences have not been reconstructed at some stage in the past 20 years. (2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
(2) Will the minister table a copy of the one to 1 000 scale as-constructed plan in respect of this lot? (3) Is the minister aware that the fences on a number of abutting lots and other nearby lots, which were removed to facilitate the laying of a sewer line, have not been re-erected on the respective cadastral boundaries; and, if so, what action will the Water Corporation take to rectify this situation? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. On behalf of the Minister for Government Enterprises, I have divided the answer into three parts as indicated by the paragraphs in the question. (1) The Water Corporation has no evidence to suggest that the fences were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries, or that the fences have not been reconstructed at some stage in the past 20 years. (2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
(3) Is the minister aware that the fences on a number of abutting lots and other nearby lots, which were removed to facilitate the laying of a sewer line, have not been re-erected on the respective cadastral boundaries; and, if so, what action will the Water Corporation take to rectify this situation? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. On behalf of the Minister for Government Enterprises, I have divided the answer into three parts as indicated by the paragraphs in the question. (1) The Water Corporation has no evidence to suggest that the fences were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries, or that the fences have not been reconstructed at some stage in the past 20 years. (2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. On behalf of the Minister for Government Enterprises, I have divided the answer into three parts as indicated by the paragraphs in the question. (1) The Water Corporation has no evidence to suggest that the fences were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries, or that the fences have not been reconstructed at some stage in the past 20 years. (2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
I thank Hon George Cash for some notice of the question. On behalf of the Minister for Government Enterprises, I have divided the answer into three parts as indicated by the paragraphs in the question. (1) The Water Corporation has no evidence to suggest that the fences were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries, or that the fences have not been reconstructed at some stage in the past 20 years. (2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
(1) The Water Corporation has no evidence to suggest that the fences were not re-erected on the actual cadastral boundaries, or that the fences have not been reconstructed at some stage in the past 20 years. (2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
(2) The plan is archived and could not be recovered in time to respond to this inquiry. A copy of the plan will be provided as soon as possible. (3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
(3) No. The Water Corporation would be keen to liaise directly with any customers who believe that the fences on their property were not re-erected on the cadastral boundary, and invites them to contact the corporation directly to enable prompt resolution of this matter.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.