Hon Helen Morton's QoN 2867 investigates contract details of public servants, specifically those earning $150,000 and $200,000, focusing on contract renewals, performance reviews, and previous salaries. The answer indicates no instances matching the criteria.

AnsweredQoN 2867Legislative Council
Asked
8 November 2005
Portfolio
Small Business

QuestionView source ↗

(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
15 March 2006
Responded by
Minister for Fisheries representing the Minister for Small Business
Response time
127 days
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
(c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
As at the 8th November 2005: (1) (a)-(c) Nil. (2) - (4) Not applicable
(1) (a)-(c) Nil. (2) - (4) Not applicable
(2) - (4) Not applicable

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more