❓ A parliamentary question addresses the Shire of Busselton's compliance with landfill site license conditions and potential environmental impacts, with the Minister confirming no breaches but ongoing groundwater monitoring. A further response on findings is pending.
AnsweredQoN 266Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
BUSSELTON LANDFILL SITE - LICENCE CONDITIONS
(1) Has the Shire of Busselton been found to have operated the Rendezvous Road landfill site outside of its Department of Environment and Conservation licence conditions at any time? (2) If so - (a) what action was taken against the Shire of Busselton; (b) what remedial works were requested to be undertaken by the Shire of Busselton; and (c) is the site currently operating within its licence conditions? (3) Has any monitoring been conducted to ensure that surrounding properties have not been impacted by contaminants including heavy metal from the landfill site through either surface drainage or the movement of groundwater? (4) Will the minister please specify the time, location and finding of these tests? Hon SALLY TALBOT
(1) Has the Shire of Busselton been found to have operated the Rendezvous Road landfill site outside of its Department of Environment and Conservation licence conditions at any time? (2) If so - (a) what action was taken against the Shire of Busselton; (b) what remedial works were requested to be undertaken by the Shire of Busselton; and (c) is the site currently operating within its licence conditions? (3) Has any monitoring been conducted to ensure that surrounding properties have not been impacted by contaminants including heavy metal from the landfill site through either surface drainage or the movement of groundwater? (4) Will the minister please specify the time, location and finding of these tests? Hon SALLY TALBOT
AnswerView source ↗
I thank Hon Nigel Hallett for some notice to the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
(2) If so - (a) what action was taken against the Shire of Busselton; (b) what remedial works were requested to be undertaken by the Shire of Busselton; and (c) is the site currently operating within its licence conditions? (3) Has any monitoring been conducted to ensure that surrounding properties have not been impacted by contaminants including heavy metal from the landfill site through either surface drainage or the movement of groundwater? (4) Will the minister please specify the time, location and finding of these tests? Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Nigel Hallett for some notice to the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
(b) what remedial works were requested to be undertaken by the Shire of Busselton; and (c) is the site currently operating within its licence conditions?
(c) is the site currently operating within its licence conditions?
(4) Will the minister please specify the time, location and finding of these tests? Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Nigel Hallett for some notice to the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Nigel Hallett for some notice to the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
I thank Hon Nigel Hallett for some notice to the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
(1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
(2) Not applicable. (3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
(3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
(4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
(2) If so - (a) what action was taken against the Shire of Busselton; (b) what remedial works were requested to be undertaken by the Shire of Busselton; and (c) is the site currently operating within its licence conditions? (3) Has any monitoring been conducted to ensure that surrounding properties have not been impacted by contaminants including heavy metal from the landfill site through either surface drainage or the movement of groundwater? (4) Will the minister please specify the time, location and finding of these tests? Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Nigel Hallett for some notice to the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
(b) what remedial works were requested to be undertaken by the Shire of Busselton; and (c) is the site currently operating within its licence conditions?
(c) is the site currently operating within its licence conditions?
(4) Will the minister please specify the time, location and finding of these tests? Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Nigel Hallett for some notice to the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
Hon SALLY TALBOT replied: I thank Hon Nigel Hallett for some notice to the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
I thank Hon Nigel Hallett for some notice to the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
(1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
(2) Not applicable. (3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
(3) Yes, monitoring has been undertaken at this site from September 1998 to the present. The monitoring has targeted potential contamination to groundwater. (4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
(4) The site has been tested since September 1998 at nine monitoring bore locations at a frequency of twice per annum for the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, potassium chloride, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc. The Department of Environment and Conservation is reviewing the relevant reports and will provide a further response to the finding once this is complete.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.