Question regarding a discrepancy between the election commitment and budget allocation for station upgrades, seeking clarification on funding reductions and potential reprioritisation of projects. The answer provides a vague explanation and defers further detail.

AnsweredQoN 2111Legislative Assembly
Asked
10 October 2017
Portfolio
Transport; Planning; Lands

QuestionView source ↗

(1) The election commitment for new and existing station upgrades was for $144 million 'based on Treasury costings', however the budget allocation for new and existing station upgrades is for $101.5 million, can you please advise? (2) How has a reduction of $42.5 million been achieved for this commitment? (3) Where have the savings been found? (4) Are any components of this commitment no longer being funded? (5) Have any components of this commitment been funded by reprioritization of existing projects, if yes which projects? (6) Have any components of this commitment been funded by savings from existing projects, if yes which projects and what is the value of the savings?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
21 November 2017
Responded by
Minister for Transport; Planning; Lands
Response time
12 days
(1)-(4) The budget allocation funds upgrades, land acquisition and additional planning. Further funding will be sought as planning activities are finalised.
(5)-(6) No

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more