❓ Hon Christine Sharp asks about the completion and tabling of the Stanton Partners probity audit report regarding native timber allocation. Hon Kim Chance confirms completion and tables the report along with the Forest Products Commission's response.
AnsweredQoN 246Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
With regard to the probity audit being conducted by Stanton Partners into the allocation of native timber supplies - (1) Has the audit for stage C been completed? (2) If not, why not? (3) If yes, will the minister table the report and all associated documents? (4) If not, why not? Hon KIM CHANCE
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(1) Has the audit for stage C been completed? (2) If not, why not? (3) If yes, will the minister table the report and all associated documents? (4) If not, why not? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(2) If not, why not? (3) If yes, will the minister table the report and all associated documents? (4) If not, why not? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(3) If yes, will the minister table the report and all associated documents? (4) If not, why not? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(4) If not, why not? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
[See paper 336.]
(1) Has the audit for stage C been completed? (2) If not, why not? (3) If yes, will the minister table the report and all associated documents? (4) If not, why not? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(2) If not, why not? (3) If yes, will the minister table the report and all associated documents? (4) If not, why not? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(3) If yes, will the minister table the report and all associated documents? (4) If not, why not? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(4) If not, why not? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(1) I am delighted to be able to say this - yes. (2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(2) Not applicable. (3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(3) I table the Stanton Partners probity audit report and the response by the Forest Products Commission to issues raised in the report. (4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
(4) Not applicable. [See paper 336.]
[See paper 336.]
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.