❓ Hon Nick Goiran asks the parliamentary secretary representing the Attorney General about documents related to a voice message mentioned in a CCC report concerning Hon Simon O'Brien. The Attorney General sought clarification from the CCC regarding an inconsistency in the report, and the response is tabled.
AnsweredQoN 810Legislative Council
Asked
14 October 2021
Member
Portfolio
parliamentary secretary representing the Attorney General
QuestionView source ↗
PROCEDURE AND PRIVILEGES COMMITTEE — REPORT ON A PERSON
ADVERSELY REFERRED TOIN THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY — HON SIMON O'BRIEN
810. Hon NICK GOIRAN to the parliamentary secretary
representing the Attorney General:
I
refer to the parliamentary secretary's answer to my question without
notice of 12 October 2021 in which he informed the house that the
Attorney General had not heard the voice message referred to in the Corruption
and Crime Commission report dated 26 November 2020, nor read a transcript of
same.
(1) Has the
Attorney General received any documents about the voice message, other than the
CCC report and its erratum?
(2) If yes, will the parliamentary secretary
table those documents?
ADVERSELY REFERRED TOIN THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY — HON SIMON O'BRIEN
810. Hon NICK GOIRAN to the parliamentary secretary
representing the Attorney General:
I
refer to the parliamentary secretary's answer to my question without
notice of 12 October 2021 in which he informed the house that the
Attorney General had not heard the voice message referred to in the Corruption
and Crime Commission report dated 26 November 2020, nor read a transcript of
same.
(1) Has the
Attorney General received any documents about the voice message, other than the
CCC report and its erratum?
(2) If yes, will the parliamentary secretary
table those documents?
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice
of the question.
(1)–(2) Yes. As page 7 of the first report of the
Legislative Assembly's Procedure and Privileges Committee states —
The
paragraph refers to a text message sent to Mr Phil Edman; the footnote refers
to a telephone call.
The Office of the Attorney General
sought clarification from the Corruption and Crime Commission on this inconsistency in its Report on electorate
allowances and management of electorate offices , and received a response
dated 3 December 2020, which I now table.
[See paper 796 .]
of the question.
(1)–(2) Yes. As page 7 of the first report of the
Legislative Assembly's Procedure and Privileges Committee states —
The
paragraph refers to a text message sent to Mr Phil Edman; the footnote refers
to a telephone call.
The Office of the Attorney General
sought clarification from the Corruption and Crime Commission on this inconsistency in its Report on electorate
allowances and management of electorate offices , and received a response
dated 3 December 2020, which I now table.
[See paper 796 .]
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.