❓ In regards to Habitat 74 and St Johns Court, I ask: (a) what was the valuer’s amount for each case of land compensation at these properties; (b) what amounts were actually paid in each case of land co
AnsweredQoN 6151Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
In regards to Habitat 74 and St Johns Court, I ask:
(a) what was the valuer’s amount for each case of land compensation at these properties;
(b) what amounts were actually paid in each case of land compensation at these properties;
(c) will the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) provide a copy of the original valuer advice from 1996–97; and
(i) if not, why not;
(d) when did the Western Australian Planning Commission receive the Joint Experts Report;
(e) will the Minister provide a copy of the Joint Experts Report;
(f) will the Minister provide a copy of all other reports related to this issue, including reports sent to Pember Wilson & Eftos, Colliers and reports from other valuers, including the report that the WAPC stated it had received in correspondence to the owner’s lawyers on 21 April 2011; and
(i) if not, why not?
(g) when was the final decision made as to whether or not an increased offer could be provided to the claimants on this matter;
(h) who signed this final decision;
(i) is this claim still under consideration by WAPC;
(j) why have there been delays in resolving this issue;
(k) what role has the WAPC specifically played in these delays;
(l) why has the WAPC failed to respond to correspondence from owners represented by Norton Rose Lawyers;
(m) will further funding be paid to owners; and
(i) if so, when;
(ii) if not, why not; and
(n) when does the WAPC expect this issue will be resolved?
(a) what was the valuer’s amount for each case of land compensation at these properties;
(b) what amounts were actually paid in each case of land compensation at these properties;
(c) will the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) provide a copy of the original valuer advice from 1996–97; and
(i) if not, why not;
(d) when did the Western Australian Planning Commission receive the Joint Experts Report;
(e) will the Minister provide a copy of the Joint Experts Report;
(f) will the Minister provide a copy of all other reports related to this issue, including reports sent to Pember Wilson & Eftos, Colliers and reports from other valuers, including the report that the WAPC stated it had received in correspondence to the owner’s lawyers on 21 April 2011; and
(i) if not, why not?
(g) when was the final decision made as to whether or not an increased offer could be provided to the claimants on this matter;
(h) who signed this final decision;
(i) is this claim still under consideration by WAPC;
(j) why have there been delays in resolving this issue;
(k) what role has the WAPC specifically played in these delays;
(l) why has the WAPC failed to respond to correspondence from owners represented by Norton Rose Lawyers;
(m) will further funding be paid to owners; and
(i) if so, when;
(ii) if not, why not; and
(n) when does the WAPC expect this issue will be resolved?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
18 October 2011
Responded by
Minister for Planning
Response time
28 days
I understand there are over 200 individual claimants in this particular matter, some of whom are represented by Norton Rose. I am advised that offers of compensation will be made to the owners represented by Norton Rose and as many other owners as possible by the end of October 2011. The claimants' legal representatives will also be provided with the opportunity to see the relevant valuations on a without prejudice basis to facilitate their clients' consideration of the amended offers. The State Solicitor's Office is liaising with Norton Rose to facilitate this process.
If the amended offers of compensation are not accepted or are disputed, the claims will be determined by a court or the State Administrative Tribunal.
In light of this process, it is not appropriate to provide responses to the specific questions asked at this stage.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
If the amended offers of compensation are not accepted or are disputed, the claims will be determined by a court or the State Administrative Tribunal.
In light of this process, it is not appropriate to provide responses to the specific questions asked at this stage.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.