❓ Hon. Tim Clifford questions the Minister for Environment regarding meetings between the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation and Satterley Property Group concerning a proposed development in North Stoneville, particularly regarding a private wastewater plant. The Minister requests more time to provide a detailed response.
AnsweredQoN 368Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
NORTH STONEVILLE DEVELOPMENT
368. Hon TIM CLIFFORD to the Minister for Environment:
I refer to question without notice
324, which noted that the department of water and regulation met with the
Satterley Property Group regarding a proposed development in north Stoneville.
(1) Who was in attendance at that
meeting?
(2) What was the topic of the
meeting and will the minister please table any minutes from that meeting?
(3) Have there
been previous meetings between Satterley and the department of water and
regulation regarding this development; and, if so, who was in attendance and
what were the dates and the topic of these meetings?
(4) Given that
the development is contingent on a private wastewater plant, will the minister
table or describe the outcomes of research or risk assessments undertaken by
the department of water about the suitability of such a plant in this location?
368. Hon TIM CLIFFORD to the Minister for Environment:
I refer to question without notice
324, which noted that the department of water and regulation met with the
Satterley Property Group regarding a proposed development in north Stoneville.
(1) Who was in attendance at that
meeting?
(2) What was the topic of the
meeting and will the minister please table any minutes from that meeting?
(3) Have there
been previous meetings between Satterley and the department of water and
regulation regarding this development; and, if so, who was in attendance and
what were the dates and the topic of these meetings?
(4) Given that
the development is contingent on a private wastewater plant, will the minister
table or describe the outcomes of research or risk assessments undertaken by
the department of water about the suitability of such a plant in this location?
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for
some notice of the question. The member referred to the department of water and
regulation a couple of times; it is the Department of Water and Environmental
Regulation, but we have answered accordingly.
Due to the level of detail
required, it is not possible to provide the information in the time frame
given. I will provide an answer to the honourable member on the first day of
the next sitting period, being 7 May 2019.
some notice of the question. The member referred to the department of water and
regulation a couple of times; it is the Department of Water and Environmental
Regulation, but we have answered accordingly.
Due to the level of detail
required, it is not possible to provide the information in the time frame
given. I will provide an answer to the honourable member on the first day of
the next sitting period, being 7 May 2019.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.