❓ WA Parliamentary Question on Notice regarding the number of staff employed on temporary contracts within the Minister for Regional Development's portfolio as of March 2009 and 2010. The question seeks a breakdown by agency, contract length, and percentage of total staff.
AnsweredQoN 1654Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
For each Department and Agency within the Minister’s portfolios -
(1) How many staff were employed on temporary contracts as at 1 March 2010?
(2) What is the number expressed as a percentage of total staff as at 1 March 2010?
(3) How many staff were employed on a temporary contract for a period of less than 12 months as at 1 March 2010?
(4) What is this number expressed as a percentage of total staff as at 1 March 2010?
(5) How many staff were employed on temporary contract as at 1 March 2009?
(6) What is this number expressed as a percentage of total staff as at 1 March 2009?
(7) How many staff were employed on a temporary contract for a period of less than 12 months as at 1 March 2009?
(8) What is this number expressed as a percentage of total staff as at 1 March 2009?
(1) How many staff were employed on temporary contracts as at 1 March 2010?
(2) What is the number expressed as a percentage of total staff as at 1 March 2010?
(3) How many staff were employed on a temporary contract for a period of less than 12 months as at 1 March 2010?
(4) What is this number expressed as a percentage of total staff as at 1 March 2010?
(5) How many staff were employed on temporary contract as at 1 March 2009?
(6) What is this number expressed as a percentage of total staff as at 1 March 2009?
(7) How many staff were employed on a temporary contract for a period of less than 12 months as at 1 March 2009?
(8) What is this number expressed as a percentage of total staff as at 1 March 2009?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
21 April 2010
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development
Response time
50 days
The Department of Regional Development and Lands
(1) 31
(2) 14%
(3) 23
(4) 10.4 %
(5) Not applicable
(6) Not applicable
(7) Not applicable
(8) Not applicable
Landgate
(1) 63.
(2) 6.85%.
(3) 57.
(4) 6.2%.
(5) 82.
(6) 9.04%.
(7) 79.
(8) 8.8%.
LandCorp
1. 3 staff members
2. 1.5%
3. 4 staff members (1 extra)
4. 2%
5. 1 staff member
6. 0.5%
7. 1 staff member
8. 0.5%
Gascoyne Development Commission
1. 4
2. 28.5%
3. Nil
4. Not applicable
5. 3
6. 25%
7. Nil
8. Not applicable
Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission
(1) One
(2) 8.3%
(3) Nil
(4) Not applicable
(5) One
(6) 8.3%
(7) Nil
(8) Not applicable
Kimberley Development Commission
(1) Three (3) members of staff were employed on temporary contracts as at 1 March 2010.
(2) The number expressed as a percentage of a total of thirteen (13) staff employed as at 1 March 2010 is 23%.
(3) No staff were employed on temporary contracts for a period of less than 12 months as at 1 March 2010.
(4) The number expressed as a percentage of a total of thirteen (13) staff employed as at 1 March 2010 is 0%.
(5) Three (3) staff were employed on temporary contracts as at 1 March 2009.
(6) The number expressed as a percentage of a total of thirteen (13) staff employed as at 1 March 2009 is 25%.
(7) One member of staff was employed on a temporary contract for a period of less than 12 months as at 1 March 2009.
(8) The number expressed as a percentage of a total of thirteen (13) staff employed as at 1 March 2009 is 8%
Mid West Development Commission
1) 7
2) 41%
3) 2
4) 11%
5) 4
6) 30%
7) 2
8) 15%
South West Development Commission
(1) One.
(2) 4 per cent.
(3) Nil.
(4) Not applicable.
(5) Two.
(6) 8.7 per cent.
(7) One.
(8) 4 per cent.
Wheatbelt Development Commission
(1) 5
(2) 33%
(3) 5
(4) 33%
(5) 9
(6) 50%
(7) 9
(8) 50%
Peel Development Commission
1) 3
2) 23%
3) 1
4) 9.5%
5) 3
6) 25%
7) 3
8) 25%
Pilbara Development Commission
1) Three
2) 30%
3) Three
4) 30%
5) Four
6) 33%
7) Four
8) 33%
Great Southern Development Commission
(1) 8 of which 3 were externally funded
(2) 50%
(3) 1
(4) 6%
(5) 5 of which 2 were externally funded
(6) 35%
(7) 0
(8) Not applicable.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
(1) 31
(2) 14%
(3) 23
(4) 10.4 %
(5) Not applicable
(6) Not applicable
(7) Not applicable
(8) Not applicable
Landgate
(1) 63.
(2) 6.85%.
(3) 57.
(4) 6.2%.
(5) 82.
(6) 9.04%.
(7) 79.
(8) 8.8%.
LandCorp
1. 3 staff members
2. 1.5%
3. 4 staff members (1 extra)
4. 2%
5. 1 staff member
6. 0.5%
7. 1 staff member
8. 0.5%
Gascoyne Development Commission
1. 4
2. 28.5%
3. Nil
4. Not applicable
5. 3
6. 25%
7. Nil
8. Not applicable
Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission
(1) One
(2) 8.3%
(3) Nil
(4) Not applicable
(5) One
(6) 8.3%
(7) Nil
(8) Not applicable
Kimberley Development Commission
(1) Three (3) members of staff were employed on temporary contracts as at 1 March 2010.
(2) The number expressed as a percentage of a total of thirteen (13) staff employed as at 1 March 2010 is 23%.
(3) No staff were employed on temporary contracts for a period of less than 12 months as at 1 March 2010.
(4) The number expressed as a percentage of a total of thirteen (13) staff employed as at 1 March 2010 is 0%.
(5) Three (3) staff were employed on temporary contracts as at 1 March 2009.
(6) The number expressed as a percentage of a total of thirteen (13) staff employed as at 1 March 2009 is 25%.
(7) One member of staff was employed on a temporary contract for a period of less than 12 months as at 1 March 2009.
(8) The number expressed as a percentage of a total of thirteen (13) staff employed as at 1 March 2009 is 8%
Mid West Development Commission
1) 7
2) 41%
3) 2
4) 11%
5) 4
6) 30%
7) 2
8) 15%
South West Development Commission
(1) One.
(2) 4 per cent.
(3) Nil.
(4) Not applicable.
(5) Two.
(6) 8.7 per cent.
(7) One.
(8) 4 per cent.
Wheatbelt Development Commission
(1) 5
(2) 33%
(3) 5
(4) 33%
(5) 9
(6) 50%
(7) 9
(8) 50%
Peel Development Commission
1) 3
2) 23%
3) 1
4) 9.5%
5) 3
6) 25%
7) 3
8) 25%
Pilbara Development Commission
1) Three
2) 30%
3) Three
4) 30%
5) Four
6) 33%
7) Four
8) 33%
Great Southern Development Commission
(1) 8 of which 3 were externally funded
(2) 50%
(3) 1
(4) 6%
(5) 5 of which 2 were externally funded
(6) 35%
(7) 0
(8) Not applicable.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.