❓ A member of parliament questions the Minister for State Development regarding specific information the government had about arrangements with iron ore buyers, following a previous statement. The Minister denies having any specific, non-public information.
AnsweredQoN 78Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer the minister to his reply to question without notice 59 given yesterday in which the minister stated that the government was aware of “arrangements with possible contractors and iron ore buyers”. (1) Did the government have any specific information about arrangements with iron ore buyers? (2) (a) If so, will the minister provide a detailed explanation of the information provided to government? (b) If not, why not? Hon KEN TRAVERS
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. The government had only public information. (2) (a) Not applicable. (b) Not applicable.
(1) Did the government have any specific information about arrangements with iron ore buyers? (2) (a) If so, will the minister provide a detailed explanation of the information provided to government? (b) If not, why not? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. The government had only public information. (2) (a) Not applicable. (b) Not applicable.
(2) (a) If so, will the minister provide a detailed explanation of the information provided to government? (b) If not, why not? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. The government had only public information. (2) (a) Not applicable. (b) Not applicable.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. The government had only public information. (2) (a) Not applicable. (b) Not applicable.
(1) No. The government had only public information. (2) (a) Not applicable. (b) Not applicable.
(2) (a) Not applicable. (b) Not applicable.
(1) Did the government have any specific information about arrangements with iron ore buyers? (2) (a) If so, will the minister provide a detailed explanation of the information provided to government? (b) If not, why not? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. The government had only public information. (2) (a) Not applicable. (b) Not applicable.
(2) (a) If so, will the minister provide a detailed explanation of the information provided to government? (b) If not, why not? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. The government had only public information. (2) (a) Not applicable. (b) Not applicable.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) No. The government had only public information. (2) (a) Not applicable. (b) Not applicable.
(1) No. The government had only public information. (2) (a) Not applicable. (b) Not applicable.
(2) (a) Not applicable. (b) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.