❓ Ravlich questions Collier on similarities between his training plan and Labor's previous plan, accusing him of plagiarism. Collier dismisses the accusation, stating the plan is based on the State Training Board's framework.
AnsweredQoN 568Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
“TRAINING WA: PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE 2009-2018”
I refer to my repeated calls over the past nine months in this place for the minister to release his training plan and his response to this house on Tuesday, 12 May, when he said “We will not be implementing Labor’s policy; we have our own.” (1) Is the minister aware that the executive summary introduction outlined in his plan, “Training WA: Planning for the Future 2009-2018” is the same as that outlined in Labor’s plan titled “Skills for Western Australia: A Plan to Transform the Training System 2008-2018”? (2) In view of his claim that he will not be implementing Labor’s policy, how does he explain this remarkable coincidence? Hon PETER COLLIER
I refer to my repeated calls over the past nine months in this place for the minister to release his training plan and his response to this house on Tuesday, 12 May, when he said “We will not be implementing Labor’s policy; we have our own.” (1) Is the minister aware that the executive summary introduction outlined in his plan, “Training WA: Planning for the Future 2009-2018” is the same as that outlined in Labor’s plan titled “Skills for Western Australia: A Plan to Transform the Training System 2008-2018”? (2) In view of his claim that he will not be implementing Labor’s policy, how does he explain this remarkable coincidence? Hon PETER COLLIER
AnswerView source ↗
(1)-(2) I thank the honourable member for the dorothy dixer. I am not surprised that the member lasted less than two years as Minister for Training. She obviously has no idea about what happens in training. The State Training Board establishes a framework for training in Western Australia. I am not sure if the member is aware of that. The State Training Board’s plan — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : We have Mother Teresa over there! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich is the authority on everything to do with training. She does not go to a technical and further education college for eight months, and she then decides that she is an authority on everything, when she is an expert on nothing! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
(1) Is the minister aware that the executive summary introduction outlined in his plan, “Training WA: Planning for the Future 2009-2018” is the same as that outlined in Labor’s plan titled “Skills for Western Australia: A Plan to Transform the Training System 2008-2018”? (2) In view of his claim that he will not be implementing Labor’s policy, how does he explain this remarkable coincidence? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: (1)-(2) I thank the honourable member for the dorothy dixer. I am not surprised that the member lasted less than two years as Minister for Training. She obviously has no idea about what happens in training. The State Training Board establishes a framework for training in Western Australia. I am not sure if the member is aware of that. The State Training Board’s plan — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : We have Mother Teresa over there! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich is the authority on everything to do with training. She does not go to a technical and further education college for eight months, and she then decides that she is an authority on everything, when she is an expert on nothing! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
(2) In view of his claim that he will not be implementing Labor’s policy, how does he explain this remarkable coincidence? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: (1)-(2) I thank the honourable member for the dorothy dixer. I am not surprised that the member lasted less than two years as Minister for Training. She obviously has no idea about what happens in training. The State Training Board establishes a framework for training in Western Australia. I am not sure if the member is aware of that. The State Training Board’s plan — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : We have Mother Teresa over there! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich is the authority on everything to do with training. She does not go to a technical and further education college for eight months, and she then decides that she is an authority on everything, when she is an expert on nothing! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER replied: (1)-(2) I thank the honourable member for the dorothy dixer. I am not surprised that the member lasted less than two years as Minister for Training. She obviously has no idea about what happens in training. The State Training Board establishes a framework for training in Western Australia. I am not sure if the member is aware of that. The State Training Board’s plan — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : We have Mother Teresa over there! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich is the authority on everything to do with training. She does not go to a technical and further education college for eight months, and she then decides that she is an authority on everything, when she is an expert on nothing! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
(1)-(2) I thank the honourable member for the dorothy dixer. I am not surprised that the member lasted less than two years as Minister for Training. She obviously has no idea about what happens in training. The State Training Board establishes a framework for training in Western Australia. I am not sure if the member is aware of that. The State Training Board’s plan — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : We have Mother Teresa over there! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich is the authority on everything to do with training. She does not go to a technical and further education college for eight months, and she then decides that she is an authority on everything, when she is an expert on nothing! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : We have Mother Teresa over there! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich is the authority on everything to do with training. She does not go to a technical and further education college for eight months, and she then decides that she is an authority on everything, when she is an expert on nothing! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : We have Mother Teresa over there! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich is the authority on everything to do with training. She does not go to a technical and further education college for eight months, and she then decides that she is an authority on everything, when she is an expert on nothing! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
(1) Is the minister aware that the executive summary introduction outlined in his plan, “Training WA: Planning for the Future 2009-2018” is the same as that outlined in Labor’s plan titled “Skills for Western Australia: A Plan to Transform the Training System 2008-2018”? (2) In view of his claim that he will not be implementing Labor’s policy, how does he explain this remarkable coincidence? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: (1)-(2) I thank the honourable member for the dorothy dixer. I am not surprised that the member lasted less than two years as Minister for Training. She obviously has no idea about what happens in training. The State Training Board establishes a framework for training in Western Australia. I am not sure if the member is aware of that. The State Training Board’s plan — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : We have Mother Teresa over there! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich is the authority on everything to do with training. She does not go to a technical and further education college for eight months, and she then decides that she is an authority on everything, when she is an expert on nothing! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
(2) In view of his claim that he will not be implementing Labor’s policy, how does he explain this remarkable coincidence? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: (1)-(2) I thank the honourable member for the dorothy dixer. I am not surprised that the member lasted less than two years as Minister for Training. She obviously has no idea about what happens in training. The State Training Board establishes a framework for training in Western Australia. I am not sure if the member is aware of that. The State Training Board’s plan — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : We have Mother Teresa over there! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich is the authority on everything to do with training. She does not go to a technical and further education college for eight months, and she then decides that she is an authority on everything, when she is an expert on nothing! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER replied: (1)-(2) I thank the honourable member for the dorothy dixer. I am not surprised that the member lasted less than two years as Minister for Training. She obviously has no idea about what happens in training. The State Training Board establishes a framework for training in Western Australia. I am not sure if the member is aware of that. The State Training Board’s plan — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : We have Mother Teresa over there! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich is the authority on everything to do with training. She does not go to a technical and further education college for eight months, and she then decides that she is an authority on everything, when she is an expert on nothing! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
(1)-(2) I thank the honourable member for the dorothy dixer. I am not surprised that the member lasted less than two years as Minister for Training. She obviously has no idea about what happens in training. The State Training Board establishes a framework for training in Western Australia. I am not sure if the member is aware of that. The State Training Board’s plan — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : We have Mother Teresa over there! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich is the authority on everything to do with training. She does not go to a technical and further education college for eight months, and she then decides that she is an authority on everything, when she is an expert on nothing! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : We have Mother Teresa over there! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich is the authority on everything to do with training. She does not go to a technical and further education college for eight months, and she then decides that she is an authority on everything, when she is an expert on nothing! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : We have Mother Teresa over there! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich is the authority on everything to do with training. She does not go to a technical and further education college for eight months, and she then decides that she is an authority on everything, when she is an expert on nothing! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : The member has the concentration span of a stick insect! If she would just listen for a minute, I would be able to give her an answer to her question. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : What we have here is absolute garbage. The honourable member throws hand grenades left, right and centre and comes up with nothing; they are duds. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : Does the member want to hear the response or not? The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
The PRESIDENT : Order! Let us hear the answer. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. The State Training Board sets the framework. That framework does not change when we shift from one government to another. The framework is still there. The issues and the challenges that are involved in training are still the same. A government then embeds its philosophy within that framework. It has never been any different. I am sure the member would be well aware of that. I am delighted that the member is so supportive, because if the member wants to talk about Labor’s policy for training, she might like to look at a document titled “Labor’s plan for skilled people”. This is the document that the Labor Party took to the election. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : This is not the document on training that was provided to the former Labor Government. This is not the document from Mark McGowan or Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich. This is the document from the State Training Board. The member has no idea. As I have said, the member is an airhead as far as training is concerned. This is the training policy that the Labor Party put in place. After we took office, I made clear to the State Training Board and the Department of Education and Training what we wanted to see articulated throughout that document. At that time, we were suffering an economic downturn. We have committed $47 million for immediate strategies to help overcome issues with regard to training. That is a comprehensive allocation of funds, and I have given ministerial statement on exactly where those funds will go. I have said that I want a true user-choice system, including in thin markets, across the state. These strategies will be implemented across Western Australia, particularly in regional and remote areas. I want to make a firm allocation of resources and commitment to Aboriginal Western Australians to ensure they are given every opportunity for training. I want to have increased public funding—a competitive allocation of up to 50 per cent. That is all embedded within the document. I also want to give TAFE colleges increased autonomy. That is also embedded within the document. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : The document that the member is referring to is not Labor Party policy. It is a State Training Board framework for training. That does not shift. We do not napalm a framework for training — Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich interjected. The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
The PRESIDENT : Order! Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich has asked a question. Wait for the answer. Do not keep interjecting. Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Hon PETER COLLIER : Thank you, Mr President. I will say again, in précis form, the State Training Board sets the framework for training. That framework for training looks at some modelling that has been done on projections for employment and on the particular industry needs that have to be met. What then happens—as I have said—is that government embeds its philosophy within that framework. That is what we have done. This is a very good and comprehensive document. It very comprehensively reflects the philosophy of the Liberal Party, and my philosophy. I am delighted with the outcome. To suggest for one moment that it is in some way a representation of “Labor’s plan for skilled people” shows the ignorance of the honourable member.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.