❓ Hon Dee Margetts asks about a mooring licence application by Mr. Marcus Gray near Remark Island. The Minister confirms the application was processed and refused due to proximity to an existing mooring, and tables relevant documents.
AnsweredQoN 837Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to an application for a mooring licence near Remark Island in the Recherche Archipelago by Mr Marcus Gray of South East Fisheries dated 8 December 2003. (1) Was this application processed; and, if so, when? (2) Was this licence approved? (3) If not, on what basis or policy was the application refused? (4) Has an application for an aquaculture licence been submitted, processed or approved in this area? (5) Will the minister table all documents, including file notes, with respect to this? Hon KEN TRAVERS
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(1) Was this application processed; and, if so, when? (2) Was this licence approved? (3) If not, on what basis or policy was the application refused? (4) Has an application for an aquaculture licence been submitted, processed or approved in this area? (5) Will the minister table all documents, including file notes, with respect to this? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(2) Was this licence approved? (3) If not, on what basis or policy was the application refused? (4) Has an application for an aquaculture licence been submitted, processed or approved in this area? (5) Will the minister table all documents, including file notes, with respect to this? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(3) If not, on what basis or policy was the application refused? (4) Has an application for an aquaculture licence been submitted, processed or approved in this area? (5) Will the minister table all documents, including file notes, with respect to this? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(4) Has an application for an aquaculture licence been submitted, processed or approved in this area? (5) Will the minister table all documents, including file notes, with respect to this? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(5) Will the minister table all documents, including file notes, with respect to this? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(1) Was this application processed; and, if so, when? (2) Was this licence approved? (3) If not, on what basis or policy was the application refused? (4) Has an application for an aquaculture licence been submitted, processed or approved in this area? (5) Will the minister table all documents, including file notes, with respect to this? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(2) Was this licence approved? (3) If not, on what basis or policy was the application refused? (4) Has an application for an aquaculture licence been submitted, processed or approved in this area? (5) Will the minister table all documents, including file notes, with respect to this? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(3) If not, on what basis or policy was the application refused? (4) Has an application for an aquaculture licence been submitted, processed or approved in this area? (5) Will the minister table all documents, including file notes, with respect to this? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(4) Has an application for an aquaculture licence been submitted, processed or approved in this area? (5) Will the minister table all documents, including file notes, with respect to this? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(5) Will the minister table all documents, including file notes, with respect to this? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
I thank the member for some notice of this question. I am advised - (1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(1) Yes. The application was processed on 4 August 2004. (2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(2) No. (3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(3) The application was refused on the basis that it was too close to an existing mooring. (4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(4) Aquaculture licences are not processed or approved by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. (5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
(5) Yes. Rather than read them, I seek leave to table the documents. Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
Leave granted. [See paper No 2758.]
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.