❓ Hon Nick Goiran asks about the difference between interpreters and translators in the context of the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2019, following concerns raised by the Voluntary Assisted Dying Board regarding confusing wording in the Act. The answer clarifies the distinct roles.
AnsweredQoN 1164Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to page 39 of the Voluntary Assisted Dying Board Western Australia Annual Report 2021-22 that states ‘The
Voluntary Assisted Dying Board is aware concerns have been raised regarding the
wording in the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2019 that relates to
interpreters, including wording required by the Written Declaration under
section 42 which confuses the roles of interpreter and translator. It is recommended that wording in the Voluntary
Assisted Dying Act 2019 should be reviewed and revised as appropriate to
clarify and more accurately represent the professional responsibilities of an
interpreter engaged for the voluntary assisted dying process.' ;and I ask, what are the differences between the role of an
interpreter and the role of a translator in the context of the engagement of an
interpreter for the voluntary assisted dying process and as they relate to this
recommendation of the Board?
Voluntary Assisted Dying Board is aware concerns have been raised regarding the
wording in the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2019 that relates to
interpreters, including wording required by the Written Declaration under
section 42 which confuses the roles of interpreter and translator. It is recommended that wording in the Voluntary
Assisted Dying Act 2019 should be reviewed and revised as appropriate to
clarify and more accurately represent the professional responsibilities of an
interpreter engaged for the voluntary assisted dying process.' ;and I ask, what are the differences between the role of an
interpreter and the role of a translator in the context of the engagement of an
interpreter for the voluntary assisted dying process and as they relate to this
recommendation of the Board?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
14 February 2023
Responded by
Leader of the House representing the Minister for Health
Response time
1 days
Section 42 requires an interpreter to certify on the written declaration that they have provided a true and correct translation of any material translated.
The role of an interpreter is to interpret a conversation between two or more people. Interpreters do not translate material, nor do they attest to the truth or correctness of translations. This is the role of a translator.
The role of an interpreter is to interpret a conversation between two or more people. Interpreters do not translate material, nor do they attest to the truth or correctness of translations. This is the role of a translator.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.