Hon Ken Travers questions the Transport portfolio regarding penalties applied to the 'A' series railcar maintenance contract for breakdowns and delays between 2011-2013. The response details penalty conditions and amounts, but declines to provide data on breakdowns without penalties due to resource constraints.

AnsweredQoN 1139Legislative Council
Asked
6 May 2014
Portfolio
Transport

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the maintenance contract for the 'A' series railcars, and ask: (a) does the contract provide for penalties to be applied when a railcar breaks down; (b) if yes to (a), what are the circumstances when penalties can be applied; (c) on how many occasions were penalties applied in: (i) 2011; (ii) 2012; and (iii) 2013; (d) on each occasion in (c): (i) what was the reason for the penalty; and (ii) what was the penalty amount; (e) on how many occasions in each year did a train break down with no penalty applied in: (i) 2011; (ii) 2012; and (iii) 2013; and (f) for each case in (e), why was no penalty applied?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
24 June 2014
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Transport
Response time
49 days
(a) Yes.
(b) Penalties can be applied when a service:
· Is cancelled or short- due to a technical fault of a railcar.
· Incurs a delay greater than or equal to four minutes due to a technical fault of a railcar.
(c)(i)-(ii) Nil.
(iii) 244 Lost Time Incidents and 94 Train Cancellation penalties were applied.
(d)(i) See part (c)(iii).
(ii) Lost Time Incidents attracted a total penalty amount of $41 028.00 and Train Cancellations attracted a total penalty amount of $310 291.00.
(e)(i)-(f) The Public Transport Authority advises that significant resources would need to be diverted from essential operational duties in order to answer this question.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more