A WA parliamentary question seeks clarification on the government's contractual obligations and potential compensation related to the Leighton marshalling yards redevelopment and the Leighton Shores proposal. The government confirms only a 'preferred tender status' arrangement exists.

AnsweredQoN 11Legislative Council
Asked
8 August 2000
Portfolio
Transport

QuestionView source ↗

In relation to the Leighton marshalling yards redevelopment - (1) Does the Government have a contract with Leighton Shores proponents? (2) Will the Government be prepared to pay compensation if the Leighton Shores proposal is rejected or substantially changed? Hon M.J. CRIDDLE

AnswerView source ↗

(1)-(2) The only arrangement with that proponent is that it has preferred tender status.
(1) Does the Government have a contract with Leighton Shores proponents? (2) Will the Government be prepared to pay compensation if the Leighton Shores proposal is rejected or substantially changed? Hon M.J. CRIDDLE replied: (1)-(2) The only arrangement with that proponent is that it has preferred tender status.
(2) Will the Government be prepared to pay compensation if the Leighton Shores proposal is rejected or substantially changed? Hon M.J. CRIDDLE replied: (1)-(2) The only arrangement with that proponent is that it has preferred tender status.
Hon M.J. CRIDDLE replied: (1)-(2) The only arrangement with that proponent is that it has preferred tender status.
(1)-(2) The only arrangement with that proponent is that it has preferred tender status.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more