❓ Hon Paul Llewellyn questions the Minister for Health regarding the proposed Denmark health facility, focusing on site selection, costs, potential delays, and statements made by health service executives. The Minister's responses confirm the park site is progressing, but provide limited detail on alternative sites or specific cost breakdowns.
AnsweredQoN 3400Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
In relation to the proposed new health facility for Denmark -
(1) Given that the Golf/Shire site was strongly recommended by the Denmark Shire CEO, that the Department of Health’s consultant and Department of Health staff ranked the Golf/Shire site better than the park site, and that health policy strongly recommends co-location with independent living units (which cannot be provided at the park site) – what are the reasons for the Minister stating that the park is the best site?
(2) Will the Minister for Health state categorically that changing the siting of the new health facility to the Golf/Shire site will not result in the loss of the project for Denmark?
(3) If no to (2), why not?
(4) When the cost of the Denmark health facility was estimated to be $ 16.5 million the building itself was costed at $ 6.115 million. Now that $ 18 million has been allocated for the project can the Minister advise what is the estimated cost of the buildings and what is the cost of site works that are specific to the park site, including run-off treatment ponds, subsurface drainage, retaining walls and unshared road costs?
(5) Can the Minister also provide an estimate of the site-specific costs for the alternative Golf/Shire site?
(6) The Denmark Shire President was quoted in the
Denmark Bulletin
as saying he was told verbally by the CEO of Country Health Services that the Denmark Hospital would close in 2007, and that if the new facility was not ready Denmark would be served by a nursing post. Can the Minister advise if indeed the CEO of Country Health Services made this statement?
(7) The CEO of Country Health Services advised the CEO of the Denmark Shire by mail on 8 February 2006 that if there was a change of site for the new health facility there would be a minimum delay of six months. Given that the use of the park site is being delayed by the EPA appeals process and that appeals are unlikely if the Golf/Shire site was used, what is the basis for the Country Health CEO's advice?
(8) Is it correct that there is a requirement for the EPA appeals process and the Town Planning Scheme amendment process to be completed before use of the park site for the new Denmark health facility can be confirmed?
(9) Does this mean that money spent on planning that is specific to the park site is money spent at risk?
(10) How much money has the Department of Health spent that is site-specific, and therefore at risk if use of the park site is refused?
(11) How much of the money spent on planning has been spent on work that is not site-specific and could therefore be transferred to an alternative site?
(12) How much money did the Department of Health spend on the Detailed Site Investigation Project No E60.7285.01, dated 17 October 2005 by MPL Health Safety Environment?
(13) Was this study done because the park site had been used for research and may contain toxic residues?
(14) How long did this report take?
(15) Would such a study be required for the Golf/Shire site and if so why?
(1) Given that the Golf/Shire site was strongly recommended by the Denmark Shire CEO, that the Department of Health’s consultant and Department of Health staff ranked the Golf/Shire site better than the park site, and that health policy strongly recommends co-location with independent living units (which cannot be provided at the park site) – what are the reasons for the Minister stating that the park is the best site?
(2) Will the Minister for Health state categorically that changing the siting of the new health facility to the Golf/Shire site will not result in the loss of the project for Denmark?
(3) If no to (2), why not?
(4) When the cost of the Denmark health facility was estimated to be $ 16.5 million the building itself was costed at $ 6.115 million. Now that $ 18 million has been allocated for the project can the Minister advise what is the estimated cost of the buildings and what is the cost of site works that are specific to the park site, including run-off treatment ponds, subsurface drainage, retaining walls and unshared road costs?
(5) Can the Minister also provide an estimate of the site-specific costs for the alternative Golf/Shire site?
(6) The Denmark Shire President was quoted in the
Denmark Bulletin
as saying he was told verbally by the CEO of Country Health Services that the Denmark Hospital would close in 2007, and that if the new facility was not ready Denmark would be served by a nursing post. Can the Minister advise if indeed the CEO of Country Health Services made this statement?
(7) The CEO of Country Health Services advised the CEO of the Denmark Shire by mail on 8 February 2006 that if there was a change of site for the new health facility there would be a minimum delay of six months. Given that the use of the park site is being delayed by the EPA appeals process and that appeals are unlikely if the Golf/Shire site was used, what is the basis for the Country Health CEO's advice?
(8) Is it correct that there is a requirement for the EPA appeals process and the Town Planning Scheme amendment process to be completed before use of the park site for the new Denmark health facility can be confirmed?
(9) Does this mean that money spent on planning that is specific to the park site is money spent at risk?
(10) How much money has the Department of Health spent that is site-specific, and therefore at risk if use of the park site is refused?
(11) How much of the money spent on planning has been spent on work that is not site-specific and could therefore be transferred to an alternative site?
(12) How much money did the Department of Health spend on the Detailed Site Investigation Project No E60.7285.01, dated 17 October 2005 by MPL Health Safety Environment?
(13) Was this study done because the park site had been used for research and may contain toxic residues?
(14) How long did this report take?
(15) Would such a study be required for the Golf/Shire site and if so why?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
3 May 2006
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Health
Response time
20 days
(2) Funding has been received and the development of the new health service facilities for Denmark on the Community Park site is progressing according to the program laid down, and it will be opened for use early in 2008. The funds allocated are for the development on the Community Park site. Should an alternative site be selected, it will require the development of a new Business Case, new approval processes and a new budget allocation. (3) Not applicable. (4) Final costings are yet to be completed for all elements of the project. The budget was increased to $18 million in recognition of the high escalation being experienced on all Capital Works projects. (5) No costings have been carried out for the Golf Club site. (6) The Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service advised the Shire councillors that, in her view, the existing facilities would not last much beyond the end of 2007, and if the health services were not rebuilt soon, the existing facilities would only effectively support a limited range of services, such as those offered by a nursing post. No mention of closure was made by the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service. (7) The master site planning process and some of the architectural work already carried out would have to be redone if the site were to change. This work would take at least six months to complete. (8) Yes. The process of rezoning the Community Park site and the EPA Appeals process do need to be completed before building works can commence. (9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(3) Not applicable. (4) Final costings are yet to be completed for all elements of the project. The budget was increased to $18 million in recognition of the high escalation being experienced on all Capital Works projects. (5) No costings have been carried out for the Golf Club site. (6) The Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service advised the Shire councillors that, in her view, the existing facilities would not last much beyond the end of 2007, and if the health services were not rebuilt soon, the existing facilities would only effectively support a limited range of services, such as those offered by a nursing post. No mention of closure was made by the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service. (7) The master site planning process and some of the architectural work already carried out would have to be redone if the site were to change. This work would take at least six months to complete. (8) Yes. The process of rezoning the Community Park site and the EPA Appeals process do need to be completed before building works can commence. (9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(4) Final costings are yet to be completed for all elements of the project. The budget was increased to $18 million in recognition of the high escalation being experienced on all Capital Works projects. (5) No costings have been carried out for the Golf Club site. (6) The Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service advised the Shire councillors that, in her view, the existing facilities would not last much beyond the end of 2007, and if the health services were not rebuilt soon, the existing facilities would only effectively support a limited range of services, such as those offered by a nursing post. No mention of closure was made by the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service. (7) The master site planning process and some of the architectural work already carried out would have to be redone if the site were to change. This work would take at least six months to complete. (8) Yes. The process of rezoning the Community Park site and the EPA Appeals process do need to be completed before building works can commence. (9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(5) No costings have been carried out for the Golf Club site. (6) The Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service advised the Shire councillors that, in her view, the existing facilities would not last much beyond the end of 2007, and if the health services were not rebuilt soon, the existing facilities would only effectively support a limited range of services, such as those offered by a nursing post. No mention of closure was made by the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service. (7) The master site planning process and some of the architectural work already carried out would have to be redone if the site were to change. This work would take at least six months to complete. (8) Yes. The process of rezoning the Community Park site and the EPA Appeals process do need to be completed before building works can commence. (9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(6) The Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service advised the Shire councillors that, in her view, the existing facilities would not last much beyond the end of 2007, and if the health services were not rebuilt soon, the existing facilities would only effectively support a limited range of services, such as those offered by a nursing post. No mention of closure was made by the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service. (7) The master site planning process and some of the architectural work already carried out would have to be redone if the site were to change. This work would take at least six months to complete. (8) Yes. The process of rezoning the Community Park site and the EPA Appeals process do need to be completed before building works can commence. (9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(7) The master site planning process and some of the architectural work already carried out would have to be redone if the site were to change. This work would take at least six months to complete. (8) Yes. The process of rezoning the Community Park site and the EPA Appeals process do need to be completed before building works can commence. (9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(8) Yes. The process of rezoning the Community Park site and the EPA Appeals process do need to be completed before building works can commence. (9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(3) Not applicable. (4) Final costings are yet to be completed for all elements of the project. The budget was increased to $18 million in recognition of the high escalation being experienced on all Capital Works projects. (5) No costings have been carried out for the Golf Club site. (6) The Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service advised the Shire councillors that, in her view, the existing facilities would not last much beyond the end of 2007, and if the health services were not rebuilt soon, the existing facilities would only effectively support a limited range of services, such as those offered by a nursing post. No mention of closure was made by the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service. (7) The master site planning process and some of the architectural work already carried out would have to be redone if the site were to change. This work would take at least six months to complete. (8) Yes. The process of rezoning the Community Park site and the EPA Appeals process do need to be completed before building works can commence. (9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(4) Final costings are yet to be completed for all elements of the project. The budget was increased to $18 million in recognition of the high escalation being experienced on all Capital Works projects. (5) No costings have been carried out for the Golf Club site. (6) The Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service advised the Shire councillors that, in her view, the existing facilities would not last much beyond the end of 2007, and if the health services were not rebuilt soon, the existing facilities would only effectively support a limited range of services, such as those offered by a nursing post. No mention of closure was made by the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service. (7) The master site planning process and some of the architectural work already carried out would have to be redone if the site were to change. This work would take at least six months to complete. (8) Yes. The process of rezoning the Community Park site and the EPA Appeals process do need to be completed before building works can commence. (9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(5) No costings have been carried out for the Golf Club site. (6) The Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service advised the Shire councillors that, in her view, the existing facilities would not last much beyond the end of 2007, and if the health services were not rebuilt soon, the existing facilities would only effectively support a limited range of services, such as those offered by a nursing post. No mention of closure was made by the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service. (7) The master site planning process and some of the architectural work already carried out would have to be redone if the site were to change. This work would take at least six months to complete. (8) Yes. The process of rezoning the Community Park site and the EPA Appeals process do need to be completed before building works can commence. (9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(6) The Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service advised the Shire councillors that, in her view, the existing facilities would not last much beyond the end of 2007, and if the health services were not rebuilt soon, the existing facilities would only effectively support a limited range of services, such as those offered by a nursing post. No mention of closure was made by the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Country Health Service. (7) The master site planning process and some of the architectural work already carried out would have to be redone if the site were to change. This work would take at least six months to complete. (8) Yes. The process of rezoning the Community Park site and the EPA Appeals process do need to be completed before building works can commence. (9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(7) The master site planning process and some of the architectural work already carried out would have to be redone if the site were to change. This work would take at least six months to complete. (8) Yes. The process of rezoning the Community Park site and the EPA Appeals process do need to be completed before building works can commence. (9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(8) Yes. The process of rezoning the Community Park site and the EPA Appeals process do need to be completed before building works can commence. (9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(9) If the site were to change, some work already carried out and paid for would have to be repeated. (10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(10) No calculation has been made on this matter. The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(11) No calculation has been made on this matter. . The priority of the work being undertaken has been to progress the development of the much-needed new facility. (12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(12) The work undertaken by MPL Health Safety and Environment Consultants was a component of the master site planning contract let to Jones Coulter Young. MPL as a sub-contractor to Jones Coulter Young dealt directly with that organisation. (13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(13) No. The study was done because the project was referred to the EPA by a member of the Friends of the Denmark Community Park Inc. (14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(14) The work undertaken by MPL took approximately seven months to complete. (15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
(15) Any person is entitled to refer a proposed development to the EPA for consideration. Such a referral may require such a study to be carried out.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.