❓ Hon Ray Halligan asked a Question on Notice regarding bad debts written off by departments and agencies under the Minister for Goldfields-Esperance and Great Southern's control since December 1, 2003. The answer reveals that the Great Southern Development Commission wrote off one bad debt of $735, while other departments and agencies reported nil.
AnsweredQoN 1457Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
For each Department and Agency under the Minister’s control, including the Ministerial office, will the Minister provide the following information -
(1) What was the amount of bad debts written off for each Department and Agency since December 1 2003?
(2) Were any of these debts above $10 000?
(3) If so, what is the name of the person or company who owed the debt?
(1) What was the amount of bad debts written off for each Department and Agency since December 1 2003?
(2) Were any of these debts above $10 000?
(3) If so, what is the name of the person or company who owed the debt?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
18 May 2005
Responded by
Minister for Fisheries representing the Minister for Goldfields-Esperance and Great Southern
Response time
14 days
(1) Nil (2) - (3) Not applicable. GOLDFIELDS ESPERANCE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) Nil (2-3) Not Applicable GREAT SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) The Great Southern Development Commission wrote of one bad debt since December 2003 for the amount of $735. (2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
(2) - (3) Not applicable. GOLDFIELDS ESPERANCE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) Nil (2-3) Not Applicable GREAT SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) The Great Southern Development Commission wrote of one bad debt since December 2003 for the amount of $735. (2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
GOLDFIELDS ESPERANCE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) Nil (2-3) Not Applicable GREAT SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) The Great Southern Development Commission wrote of one bad debt since December 2003 for the amount of $735. (2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
(1) Nil (2-3) Not Applicable GREAT SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) The Great Southern Development Commission wrote of one bad debt since December 2003 for the amount of $735. (2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
(2-3) Not Applicable GREAT SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) The Great Southern Development Commission wrote of one bad debt since December 2003 for the amount of $735. (2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
GREAT SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) The Great Southern Development Commission wrote of one bad debt since December 2003 for the amount of $735. (2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
(1) The Great Southern Development Commission wrote of one bad debt since December 2003 for the amount of $735. (2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
(2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
(3) Not applicable
(2) - (3) Not applicable. GOLDFIELDS ESPERANCE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) Nil (2-3) Not Applicable GREAT SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) The Great Southern Development Commission wrote of one bad debt since December 2003 for the amount of $735. (2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
GOLDFIELDS ESPERANCE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) Nil (2-3) Not Applicable GREAT SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) The Great Southern Development Commission wrote of one bad debt since December 2003 for the amount of $735. (2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
(1) Nil (2-3) Not Applicable GREAT SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) The Great Southern Development Commission wrote of one bad debt since December 2003 for the amount of $735. (2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
(2-3) Not Applicable GREAT SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) The Great Southern Development Commission wrote of one bad debt since December 2003 for the amount of $735. (2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
GREAT SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (1) The Great Southern Development Commission wrote of one bad debt since December 2003 for the amount of $735. (2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
(1) The Great Southern Development Commission wrote of one bad debt since December 2003 for the amount of $735. (2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
(2) No, the GSDC had no bad debts above $10,000 (3) Not applicable
(3) Not applicable
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.