A WA parliamentary question seeks a breakdown of $1.33 million spent on technical and advisory services for the Osprey Village project, and clarification on the funding source. The answer provides a detailed breakdown of expenditure across various organisations and clarifies the funding sources.

AnsweredQoN 4429Legislative Assembly
Asked
12 August 2015
Portfolio
Housing

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to responses to questions arising from 2015-16 Legislative Council Estimates hearings and ask in relation to the response that $1,333,900 has been spent on technical and advisory services in relation to the Osprey Village project, and I ask: (a) could the Minister provide a breakdown of the allocation of this amount to the various organisations engaged to provide technical and advisory services; and (b) was the $1,333,900 amount incorporated within the $33 million funding from the Department of Housing or the $20 million from Royalties for Regions?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
15 September 2015
Responded by
Minister representing the Minister for Housing
Response time
34 days
The Housing Authority advises that for delivery of the land development for a 295 unit housing estate:
(a) Blueprint building inspections $105 996.
Bluestone $808 746.
Braxford Consultancy Pty Ltd $6 325.
Deloitte Touche Tohmasu $15 000.
Gel Group $341 676.
Lavan Legal $9 944.
M3 Property $10 500.
McGees Property $8 000.
Solomon Bros $7 054.
CBRE Ltd $11 587.
Colliers International $9 072.
(b) $1 103 593 was incorporated within the $33 million Housing Authority funding. $230 307 was funded from operational revenue.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more