❓ Mr. McGowan questions the Department of Housing on the implementation of the disruptive behaviour management strategy in public housing, seeking detailed data on tenancy terminations. The Department provides limited regional data and is unable to answer several questions.
AnsweredQoN 1796Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
In the implementation of the disruptive behaviour management strategy in the financial year 2011-12, for each public housing zone administered by the Department of Housing: (a) how many first strikes were issued; (b) how many second strikes were issued; (c) how many third strikes were issued; (d) how many tenancies were terminated as a direct result of disruptive behaviour; (e) how many tenancies were terminated when disruptive behaviour was present and the tenant was required to vacate for other reasons; (f) how many tenancies were terminated prior to the issue of three strikes; (g) how many tenancies were subject to third strikes but the tenants were not evicted or did not vacate; (h) how many children were represented in the total number of tenancy terminations; (i) how many Aboriginal children were represented in the total number of tenancy terminations; (j) how many people with disabilities were represented in the total number of tenancy terminations; and (k) how many women seeking to escape violent former partners were represented in the total number of tenancy terminations?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
20 March 2014
Response time
30 days
The Department of Housing advises:
(a)
- (d)
The Department is only able to provide figures based on its regions.
[See Tabled Paper no.]
(e)
Sixty-four tenancies were terminated for reasons other than disruptive behaviour where the maximum action under the disruptive behaviour management strategy was concurrently taking place. This data is not collated by region.
(f) - (k)
The Department is unable to answer these questions.
The Department has a memorandum of understanding and works closely with the Department for Child Protection and Family Support in relation to families that are at risk of termination.
(a)
- (d)
The Department is only able to provide figures based on its regions.
[See Tabled Paper no.]
(e)
Sixty-four tenancies were terminated for reasons other than disruptive behaviour where the maximum action under the disruptive behaviour management strategy was concurrently taking place. This data is not collated by region.
(f) - (k)
The Department is unable to answer these questions.
The Department has a memorandum of understanding and works closely with the Department for Child Protection and Family Support in relation to families that are at risk of termination.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.