❓ A WA parliamentary question seeks detailed information on the location, staffing, budget, and historical funding of Western Australia's domestic and international trade offices. The Minister provides a partial response, focusing on offices under their direct responsibility.
AnsweredQoN 1851Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
Will the Minister please advise of the following in regards to each of Western Australia’s domestic and international trade offices -
(1) Where are these offices located?
(2) What is the total number of people employed in each office?
(3) Of the people employed in each office -
(a) how many are Western Australian;
(b) how many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located (where relevant); and
(c) how many are permanent residents of the State in which the office is located (where relevant)?
(4) What is the total budget for each office, including but not limited to -
(a) a breakdown of wages and salaries;
(b) promotional activities;
(c) lease costs; and
(d) travel costs?
(5) What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operation of these offices in the years -
(a) 1995-1996;
(b) 1996-1997;
(c) 1997-1998;
(d) 1998-1999;
(e) 1999-2000;
(f) 2000-2001;
(g) 2001-2002;
(h) 2002-2003;
(i) 2003-2004;
(j) 2004-2005;
(k) 2005-2006;
(l) 2006-2007;
(m) 2007-2008; and
(n) 2008-2009?
(1) Where are these offices located?
(2) What is the total number of people employed in each office?
(3) Of the people employed in each office -
(a) how many are Western Australian;
(b) how many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located (where relevant); and
(c) how many are permanent residents of the State in which the office is located (where relevant)?
(4) What is the total budget for each office, including but not limited to -
(a) a breakdown of wages and salaries;
(b) promotional activities;
(c) lease costs; and
(d) travel costs?
(5) What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operation of these offices in the years -
(a) 1995-1996;
(b) 1996-1997;
(c) 1997-1998;
(d) 1998-1999;
(e) 1999-2000;
(f) 2000-2001;
(g) 2001-2002;
(h) 2002-2003;
(i) 2003-2004;
(j) 2004-2005;
(k) 2005-2006;
(l) 2006-2007;
(m) 2007-2008; and
(n) 2008-2009?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
21 June 2005
Responded by
Leader of the House representing the Minister for State Development
Response time
35 days
(b) how many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located (where relevant); and (c) how many are permanent residents of the State in which the office is located (where relevant)?
(c) how many are permanent residents of the State in which the office is located (where relevant)?
(b) promotional activities; (c) lease costs; and (d) travel costs?
(c) lease costs; and (d) travel costs?
(d) travel costs?
(b) 1996-1997; (c) 1997-1998; (d) 1998-1999; (e) 1999-2000; (f) 2000-2001; (g) 2001-2002; (h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(c) 1997-1998; (d) 1998-1999; (e) 1999-2000; (f) 2000-2001; (g) 2001-2002; (h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(d) 1998-1999; (e) 1999-2000; (f) 2000-2001; (g) 2001-2002; (h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(e) 1999-2000; (f) 2000-2001; (g) 2001-2002; (h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(f) 2000-2001; (g) 2001-2002; (h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(g) 2001-2002; (h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(n) 2008-2009?
There are no domestic trade offices. Trade offices for which I am responsible, are located in Shanghai and Hangzhou (China); Mumbai and Chennai (India); Jakarta (Indonesia); Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia); Seoul (South Korea); Taipei (Taiwan) and Bangkok (Thailand). The Premier through the Department of Premier and Cabinet manages and allocates funding for the offices of London, Tokyo, Kobe and Dubai. My answer to the remaining questions relates to the offices to which I am responsible. 2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
Trade offices for which I am responsible, are located in Shanghai and Hangzhou (China); Mumbai and Chennai (India); Jakarta (Indonesia); Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia); Seoul (South Korea); Taipei (Taiwan) and Bangkok (Thailand). The Premier through the Department of Premier and Cabinet manages and allocates funding for the offices of London, Tokyo, Kobe and Dubai. My answer to the remaining questions relates to the offices to which I am responsible. 2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
The Premier through the Department of Premier and Cabinet manages and allocates funding for the offices of London, Tokyo, Kobe and Dubai. My answer to the remaining questions relates to the offices to which I am responsible. 2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
My answer to the remaining questions relates to the offices to which I am responsible. 2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
(c) how many are permanent residents of the State in which the office is located (where relevant)?
(b) promotional activities; (c) lease costs; and (d) travel costs?
(c) lease costs; and (d) travel costs?
(d) travel costs?
(b) 1996-1997; (c) 1997-1998; (d) 1998-1999; (e) 1999-2000; (f) 2000-2001; (g) 2001-2002; (h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(c) 1997-1998; (d) 1998-1999; (e) 1999-2000; (f) 2000-2001; (g) 2001-2002; (h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(d) 1998-1999; (e) 1999-2000; (f) 2000-2001; (g) 2001-2002; (h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(e) 1999-2000; (f) 2000-2001; (g) 2001-2002; (h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(f) 2000-2001; (g) 2001-2002; (h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(g) 2001-2002; (h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(h) 2002-2003; (i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(i) 2003-2004; (j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(j) 2004-2005; (k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(k) 2005-2006; (l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(l) 2006-2007; (m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(m) 2007-2008; and (n) 2008-2009?
(n) 2008-2009?
There are no domestic trade offices. Trade offices for which I am responsible, are located in Shanghai and Hangzhou (China); Mumbai and Chennai (India); Jakarta (Indonesia); Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia); Seoul (South Korea); Taipei (Taiwan) and Bangkok (Thailand). The Premier through the Department of Premier and Cabinet manages and allocates funding for the offices of London, Tokyo, Kobe and Dubai. My answer to the remaining questions relates to the offices to which I am responsible. 2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
Trade offices for which I am responsible, are located in Shanghai and Hangzhou (China); Mumbai and Chennai (India); Jakarta (Indonesia); Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia); Seoul (South Korea); Taipei (Taiwan) and Bangkok (Thailand). The Premier through the Department of Premier and Cabinet manages and allocates funding for the offices of London, Tokyo, Kobe and Dubai. My answer to the remaining questions relates to the offices to which I am responsible. 2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
The Premier through the Department of Premier and Cabinet manages and allocates funding for the offices of London, Tokyo, Kobe and Dubai. My answer to the remaining questions relates to the offices to which I am responsible. 2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
My answer to the remaining questions relates to the offices to which I am responsible. 2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
2. What is the total number of people employed in each office? Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
Offices People Employed Shanghai 4 Hangzhou 2.5 Mumbai 7 Chennai&nbs p;1 Jakarta 3 Kuala Lumpur 2 Seoul 3 Taipei 1 Bangkok 1 3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
3. Of the people employed in each office - a) How many are Western Australian? b) How many are citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located? c) How many are Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located? Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
Offices Western Australian (appointed from Western Australia) Citizens of the foreign country in which the office is located Permanent Residents of the State in which the office is located Shanghai 1 3 0 Hangzhou 0 2.5 0 M umbai 1 6 0 Chennai 0 1 1 Jakarta 1&nbs p;2 2 Kuala Lumpur 1 1 0 Seoul 1 2 0 Taipei 1 0 0 Bangkok 0 1 0 4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
4. What is the total budget of each office, including but not limited to, a) a breakdown of wages and salaries b) promotional activities c) lease costs d) travel costs Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
Offices Total Budget in 2004/05(A$ '000) Wages and Salaries(including allowances for Regional Directors)(A$ '000) Promotional Activities(A$ '000) Lease costs(A$ '000) Travel costs(A$ '000) Shanghai 546 220 10 170 10 Hangzhou (I ncluded in Shanghai office budget) 60 14 3 Mumbai 496 186 45 11 2 20 Chennai (Included in Mumbai office budget) Jakarta 420 122 20 25&nbs p;23 Kuala Lumpur 260 126 33 35 8 Seoul 320 172 88 40 20 Taipei 180* Bangkok 9 7* · Contract with Austrade on a lump-sum agreement. 5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
5. What is the total amount of money that was, or is, allocated for the operations of these offices in the years - a) 1995-1996 b) 1996-1997 c) 1997-1998 d) 1998 -1999 e) 1999-2000 f) 2000-2001 g) 2001-2002 h) 2002-2003 i) 2003-2004 j) 2004-2005 k) 2005-2006 l)&n bsp;2006-2007 m) 2007-2008 n) 2008-2009 Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
Amount of money spent by Overseas Offices managed by Department of Industry and ResourcesA$ (million) 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999& nbsp; 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 ;1.964 2003-2004 1.913 2004-2005 2.040 (as at 10 June 05) 2005-2006 Allocation to be finalised. 2006-2007 Allocation to be finalised. 2007-2008 Allocation to be finalised. 2008-2009 Allocation to be finalised. Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
Note: 1) Unable to provide allocation from 1995/96 to 2001/02 as the finance system has changed with the various merges prior to Department of Industry and Resources. The current system does not capture the allocation of money to the overseas offices. The figures given above are actuals. 2) Funding allocation predominantly is made from within the Departmental budget allocation. Allocation has not been established from 2005/06 onwards with the exception of Cabinet allocation of funds specific to South Korean office and a new USA office.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.