The question seeks information regarding Water Resources employees who were contracted at higher salaries than their permanent public servant salaries in 2001 and 2005, whether their contracts were rolled over, and if they received performance reviews. The answer confirms performance reviews were conducted.

AnsweredQoN 2837Legislative Council
Asked
8 November 2005
Portfolio
Water Resources

QuestionView source ↗

(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
14 March 2006
Responded by
Leader of the House representing the Minister for Water Resources
Response time
126 days
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
(c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more