❓ The question probes the government's rationale for relocating the new Women and Babies Hospital from QEII to Fiona Stanley Hospital, specifically questioning the existence and transparency of a supporting business case.
⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 760Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the Government's decision not to build the new Women and Babies Hospital at the preferred Queen Elizabeth II (QEII) site and I ask:
(a) Does the State Government have a business case to support the decision to build the hospital at Fiona Stanley Hospital (FSH);
(b) If yes to (a), will the Government make the business case public; and
(c) If no to (a), will the Government commission such a business case before commencing construction at FSH?
Answered on
(a) Does the State Government have a business case to support the decision to build the hospital at Fiona Stanley Hospital (FSH);
(b) If yes to (a), will the Government make the business case public; and
(c) If no to (a), will the Government commission such a business case before commencing construction at FSH?
Answered on
AnswerView source ↗
⏳
This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.