❓ WA Parliamentary Question on Notice regarding forestry revenue, ecological thinning program costs, and sandalwood licensing. The questions probe budget allocations, program effectiveness, and potential financial risks.
AnsweredQoN 447Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Estimated actual revenue for 2024/25 is $124.643 million, declining to $111.853 million in the 2025/26 budget . Could you please provide a detailed breakdown of the 2025/26 revenue estimates by operational area—both in dollar terms and as a percentage of total revenue? Specifically, please include : (a) Native forest operations; (b) Plantation timber; and (c) Sandalwood? (2) In light of the uncertainty surrounding the renewal of the Sandalwood licence beyond 31 December 2026, what is the revenue allocation for Sandalwood in the outer years of the budget: (a) Has this allocation been reduced to reflect the risk of non-renewal; and (b) If the allocation for Sandalwood remains at prior-year levels, is there a risk that we have overstated the profit line and improved the cash flow with something that is not going to happen? (3) Referencing the revenue from operations in the current state budget and the alignment of expenses with revenue decline, given the projected revenue decrease by $13.20 million (a 10.6% drop), have operational and fixed costs been reduced proportionately: (a) Please provide examples of how fixed costs have been scaled back in response? (4) Since the inception of the Ecological Thinning Program, what is the cumulative net shortfall between the revenue received, which should be returned monthly to Treasury, and the amount deducted from the Treasury Special Purpose Account through the program account? (how much of the program is effectively being subsidised by the taxpayer)? (5) Budget Paper No 3 pages 285-286, heading “Ecological Thinning Account”, states “drawdowns totalling $43.1M are forecast in 2025/2026 with $34.2M allocated to support contractor payments”. How does the amount for contractor payments compare to total expended in 2024/2025: (a) How many contractors and how many machines does the $34.2M cover; and (b) When will the ecological thinning operations plan for 2025/2026 be released : (i) If already released will the Minister table the plan? (6) Budget Paper No 3 pages 285-286, heading “Ecological Thinning Account”, states “drawdowns totalling $43.1M are forecast in 2025/2026 with $8.3M allocated for overheads”. Please detail the nature of the overheads and provide an itemised breakdown of the overheads: (a) Are these overheads incurred by the Forest Products Commission (FPC) or the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA): (i) If both, please provide a breakdown of overheads for each agency; and (b) How many FTEs are allocated to the management of ecological thinning operations in each DBCA and FPC? (7) Budget Paper No 3 pages 285-286, heading “Ecological Thinning Account”, states “drawdowns totalling $43.1M are forecast in 2025/2026” and over the forward estimates the forecast drawdowns are $46M, $46M, and $47M respectively over the out years. Does this mean the Government expects the scale of ecological thinning operations to remain static over the forward estimates (noting this falls well short of the up to 8,000 hectares of ecological thinning specified in the Forest Management Plan as required to protect the health of our forests)? (8) Budget Paper No 3 pages 285-286, heading “Ecological Thinning Account”, states receipts of $161M were forecast to be received in 2024/2025 and receipts of $31M are forecast to be received in 2025/2026. Was the forecast figure for 2024/2025 of $161M realised: (a) If not, how much was realised? (9) Budget Paper No 3 pages 285-286, heading “Ecological Thinning Account”, states receipts of $161M were forecast to be received in 2024/2025 and receipts of $31M are forecast to be received in 2025/2026. Why is the forecast receipts for 2025/2026 about one fifth of the amount realised/forecast receipts in 2024/2025? (10) Budget Paper No 3 pages 285-286, heading “Ecological Thinning Account”, states receipts of $161M were forecast to be received in 2024/2025 and receipts of $31M are forecast to be received in 2025/2026. Is it the case that the Government's investment in ecological thinning in 2025/2026 is just $5m more than the forecast receipts? (11) Budget Paper No 3 pages 285-286, heading “Ecological Thinning Account”, states receipts of $161M were forecast to be received in 2024/2025 and receipts of $31M are forecast to be received in 2025/2026. Is it the case that the Government’s investment in ecological thinning in the out years is $4m (2026-27), $2m (2027-28) and $3m (2028-29) less than forecast receipts for those respective years? (12) Budget Paper No 3 pages 285-286, heading “Ecological Thinning Account”, states receipts of $161M were forecast to be received in 2024/2025 and receipts of $31M are forecast to be received in 2025/2026. Noting the Government’s stated objective to protect the health of our forests in a drying climate, why isn’t the Government investment in ecological thinning greater? (13) I refer to Budget Paper No 3 page 292, heading “ Softwood Plantation Expansion Fund”, and I ask: (a) based on the current trajectory, how much land is forecast to be purchased in total from the $350m fund? (14) Budget Paper No 2 Part 2, page 292 under the heading “Asset Investment Program” states the FPC “will spend $91.3m over the forward estimates period on the acquisition of land and the establishment of plantations to support the expansion of its softwood plantation estate”. I note that the payments out of the Softwood Plantation Expansion Fund Treasurer’s Special Purpose Account for the same period is $122m, and I ask: (a) how will the balance of $30.7m (being $122m - $91.3m) be spent/allocated? (15) Budget Paper No 2 Part 2, page 293, states under the heading “Financial Statements – Income Statement – Revenue” that the decrease of $13.2 m in sale of goods and services from 2024/2025 Estimated Actual to the 2025/2-26 Budget is driven by a decrease in expected timber sales volumes”. What is the reason for the expected decrease in timber sales volumes: (a) Is it the case that contracts are in place, and new contracts are expected to be awarded under the Request for Proposals process: (i) If yes, then surely timber sale volumes should be expected to increase; and (ii) If not, why not? (16) Budget Paper No 2 Part 2, page 293, states under the heading “Financial Statements – Income Statement – Expenses” that the decrease of $9.1m in supplies and services from the 2024/2025 Estimated Actual to the 2025/2026 Budget is driven by a forecast reduction in production costs”, and noting contractor contracts are in place, I ask what is the reason for the forecast reduction in production costs?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
16 September 2025
Responded by
Minister representing the Minister for Forestry
Response time
9 days
(1) (a) – (c) 2025/26 revenue estimates by operational area are shown below.
$Million
% of Total Revenue
Plantations
$88.1
79%
Native Forest
$7.2
6%
Sandalwood
$16.2
15%
Total Timber Revenue
$111.5
100%
(2) The revenue allocated to Sandalwood in the Budget is $16.3 million in 2026–27, $18.0 million in 2027–28, and $18.0 million in 2028–29. These allocations are provisional and remain subject to a Government decision on licensing arrangements beyond 31 December 2026.
(a) Yes
(b) These allocations are provisional and remain subject to a Government decision on licensing arrangements beyond 31 December 2026.
(3) Yes
(a) There is a forecast reduction in supplies and services of $9.1M, in addition to a reduction in other costs, including consumables, accommodation expenses and licence amortisation.
(4) The cumulative net financial impact of the ecological thinning program cannot yet be determined as a portion of the wood produced has been kept in reserves for future sale.
(5) The total amount for contractor payments expended on ecological thinning in 2024/2025 was $22.7 M. This amount includes costs associated with the retrofit of harvesters to spray coppice.
(a) The 2025–26 allocation covers three contractors, operating up to nine harvest systems (17 harvesters in total).
(b) The plan is prepared and released by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA). The question should be referred to the Minister for Environment.
(i) As above
(6) The overheads include salaries, corporate overheads, and costs associated with the management and supervision of contractors.
(a) The overheads are incurred by the FPC.
(i) Not applicable. For matters relating to overheads incurred by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA), this question is best directed to DBCA.
(b) The funding available for overheads associated with ecological thinning supports approximately 41 FTE equivalents across multiple areas within the FPC. Information on FTEs allocated to ecological thinning within DBCA should be sought directly from that agency.
(7) The Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA) is responsible for determining the scale and delivery of the ecological thinning program.
(8) The figure of $161M comprised an initial appropriation to the account of $150.6 million and receipts from the sales of products derived from ecological thinning.
(a) Not applicable. The premise of the question is incorrect.
(9) The premise of the question is incorrect. The receipts of $161M in 2024/25 include an initial appropriation of $150.6 M and cannot be compared with subsequent years.
(10) An analysis of total costs and anticipated revenues for the first full year of operations is currently being completed. For the scale of operations contemplated in the budget it is anticipated that the costs will exceed revenues by more than $5M.
(11) This is not a correct interpretation of the data. The information referred to indicates that costs associated with ecological thinning will be greater than forecast receipts.
(12) The premise of the question is incorrect. The receipts of $161M in 2024/25 include an initial appropriation of $150.6 M and cannot be compared with subsequent years.
(13) (a) If the project were to focus only on freehold land in future, an area of approximately 20-25,000 hectares is likely to be achieved based on current land prices. This area will increase if the proportion of joint venture arrangements with landowners increases.
(14) (a) The $91.3 million identified in the Asset Investment Program (AIP) relates to the acquisition of land only. The difference of $30.7 million (being $122.0 million less $91.3 million) represents expenditure for plantation establishment, which is funded through the Softwood Plantation Expansion Fund but is not recorded as an AIP item.
(15) (a) Revenue forecasts for 2025/26 are consistent with the actual sales in 2024/25 and reflect a prolonged downturn in housing construction.
(i) Some new contracts awarded under the current RFP are expected to replace existing contracts that expire during 2025/26. It is anticipated that other contracts will lead to the development of new industries, some of which may require the development of new infrastructure before there are significant increases in sales volumes.
(ii) As per above
(16) The forecast reduction in production costs in 2025–26 primarily reflects a reduction in budgeted harvest volumes, consistent with the lower timber sales forecast, and a decrease in harvest costs associated with mine-site clearing, as these costs are now incurred directly by mining companies rather than FPC.
$Million
% of Total Revenue
Plantations
$88.1
79%
Native Forest
$7.2
6%
Sandalwood
$16.2
15%
Total Timber Revenue
$111.5
100%
(2) The revenue allocated to Sandalwood in the Budget is $16.3 million in 2026–27, $18.0 million in 2027–28, and $18.0 million in 2028–29. These allocations are provisional and remain subject to a Government decision on licensing arrangements beyond 31 December 2026.
(a) Yes
(b) These allocations are provisional and remain subject to a Government decision on licensing arrangements beyond 31 December 2026.
(3) Yes
(a) There is a forecast reduction in supplies and services of $9.1M, in addition to a reduction in other costs, including consumables, accommodation expenses and licence amortisation.
(4) The cumulative net financial impact of the ecological thinning program cannot yet be determined as a portion of the wood produced has been kept in reserves for future sale.
(5) The total amount for contractor payments expended on ecological thinning in 2024/2025 was $22.7 M. This amount includes costs associated with the retrofit of harvesters to spray coppice.
(a) The 2025–26 allocation covers three contractors, operating up to nine harvest systems (17 harvesters in total).
(b) The plan is prepared and released by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA). The question should be referred to the Minister for Environment.
(i) As above
(6) The overheads include salaries, corporate overheads, and costs associated with the management and supervision of contractors.
(a) The overheads are incurred by the FPC.
(i) Not applicable. For matters relating to overheads incurred by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA), this question is best directed to DBCA.
(b) The funding available for overheads associated with ecological thinning supports approximately 41 FTE equivalents across multiple areas within the FPC. Information on FTEs allocated to ecological thinning within DBCA should be sought directly from that agency.
(7) The Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA) is responsible for determining the scale and delivery of the ecological thinning program.
(8) The figure of $161M comprised an initial appropriation to the account of $150.6 million and receipts from the sales of products derived from ecological thinning.
(a) Not applicable. The premise of the question is incorrect.
(9) The premise of the question is incorrect. The receipts of $161M in 2024/25 include an initial appropriation of $150.6 M and cannot be compared with subsequent years.
(10) An analysis of total costs and anticipated revenues for the first full year of operations is currently being completed. For the scale of operations contemplated in the budget it is anticipated that the costs will exceed revenues by more than $5M.
(11) This is not a correct interpretation of the data. The information referred to indicates that costs associated with ecological thinning will be greater than forecast receipts.
(12) The premise of the question is incorrect. The receipts of $161M in 2024/25 include an initial appropriation of $150.6 M and cannot be compared with subsequent years.
(13) (a) If the project were to focus only on freehold land in future, an area of approximately 20-25,000 hectares is likely to be achieved based on current land prices. This area will increase if the proportion of joint venture arrangements with landowners increases.
(14) (a) The $91.3 million identified in the Asset Investment Program (AIP) relates to the acquisition of land only. The difference of $30.7 million (being $122.0 million less $91.3 million) represents expenditure for plantation establishment, which is funded through the Softwood Plantation Expansion Fund but is not recorded as an AIP item.
(15) (a) Revenue forecasts for 2025/26 are consistent with the actual sales in 2024/25 and reflect a prolonged downturn in housing construction.
(i) Some new contracts awarded under the current RFP are expected to replace existing contracts that expire during 2025/26. It is anticipated that other contracts will lead to the development of new industries, some of which may require the development of new infrastructure before there are significant increases in sales volumes.
(ii) As per above
(16) The forecast reduction in production costs in 2025–26 primarily reflects a reduction in budgeted harvest volumes, consistent with the lower timber sales forecast, and a decrease in harvest costs associated with mine-site clearing, as these costs are now incurred directly by mining companies rather than FPC.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.