❓ Question on Notice regarding the potential mandatory retirement age for Justices of the Peace (JPs) in Western Australia and their continued use of the title after retirement. The Attorney General's answer deemed parts 2 and 3 'not applicable'.
AnsweredQoN 640Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Is the Attorney General considering requiring or introducing legislation the retirement of Justices of the Peace who reach a specified age?
(2) In either case, would a Justice of the Peace who retired in such circumstances be entitled to describe themselves in any manner as a Justice of the Peace?
(3) If so, in what manner?
(2) In either case, would a Justice of the Peace who retired in such circumstances be entitled to describe themselves in any manner as a Justice of the Peace?
(3) If so, in what manner?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
14 May 2003
Responded by
Minister for Racing and Gaming representing the Attorney General
Response time
41 days
(2)-(3) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.