❓ Hon Ray Halligan asks about community and stakeholder surveys conducted by the Department of Fisheries between 2001 and 2006, including their purpose, cost, and future relevance. The answer details the surveys, their costs, and future plans.
AnsweredQoN 3787Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(b) 2001-2002; (c) 2002-2003; (d) 2004-2005; and (e) 2005-2006
(c) 2002-2003; (d) 2004-2005; and (e) 2005-2006
(d) 2004-2005; and (e) 2005-2006
(e) 2005-2006
(c) 2002-2003; (d) 2004-2005; and (e) 2005-2006
(d) 2004-2005; and (e) 2005-2006
(e) 2005-2006
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
17 October 2006
Responded by
Minister for Fisheries
Response time
56 days
1). (a)- (e) The Department of Fisheries conducts an annual community survey for the purposes of collecting: I. Data on the level of recall and awareness of the Department; II. Data on the understanding and support of the community for the Department's management strategies; and III. Data on recreational fishing participation. Data from the community surveys is also used for performance indicator reporting as part of the Annual Report. Community surveys were conducted in June 2001, May 2002, May 2003, May 2004, May 2005 and May 2006. In addition to the community surveys, stakeholder surveys were conducted in November 2002 and August 2004. These surveys target direct stakeholders and evaluate perceptions of the Department's management of its core programs and satisfaction with the level of service provided. This data is also used for performance indicator purposes. 2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
I. Data on the level of recall and awareness of the Department; II. Data on the understanding and support of the community for the Department's management strategies; and III. Data on recreational fishing participation. Data from the community surveys is also used for performance indicator reporting as part of the Annual Report. Community surveys were conducted in June 2001, May 2002, May 2003, May 2004, May 2005 and May 2006. In addition to the community surveys, stakeholder surveys were conducted in November 2002 and August 2004. These surveys target direct stakeholders and evaluate perceptions of the Department's management of its core programs and satisfaction with the level of service provided. This data is also used for performance indicator purposes. 2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
II. Data on the understanding and support of the community for the Department's management strategies; and III. Data on recreational fishing participation. Data from the community surveys is also used for performance indicator reporting as part of the Annual Report. Community surveys were conducted in June 2001, May 2002, May 2003, May 2004, May 2005 and May 2006. In addition to the community surveys, stakeholder surveys were conducted in November 2002 and August 2004. These surveys target direct stakeholders and evaluate perceptions of the Department's management of its core programs and satisfaction with the level of service provided. This data is also used for performance indicator purposes. 2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
III. Data on recreational fishing participation. Data from the community surveys is also used for performance indicator reporting as part of the Annual Report. Community surveys were conducted in June 2001, May 2002, May 2003, May 2004, May 2005 and May 2006. In addition to the community surveys, stakeholder surveys were conducted in November 2002 and August 2004. These surveys target direct stakeholders and evaluate perceptions of the Department's management of its core programs and satisfaction with the level of service provided. This data is also used for performance indicator purposes. 2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
Data from the community surveys is also used for performance indicator reporting as part of the Annual Report. Community surveys were conducted in June 2001, May 2002, May 2003, May 2004, May 2005 and May 2006. In addition to the community surveys, stakeholder surveys were conducted in November 2002 and August 2004. These surveys target direct stakeholders and evaluate perceptions of the Department's management of its core programs and satisfaction with the level of service provided. This data is also used for performance indicator purposes. 2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
Community surveys were conducted in June 2001, May 2002, May 2003, May 2004, May 2005 and May 2006. In addition to the community surveys, stakeholder surveys were conducted in November 2002 and August 2004. These surveys target direct stakeholders and evaluate perceptions of the Department's management of its core programs and satisfaction with the level of service provided. This data is also used for performance indicator purposes. 2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
In addition to the community surveys, stakeholder surveys were conducted in November 2002 and August 2004. These surveys target direct stakeholders and evaluate perceptions of the Department's management of its core programs and satisfaction with the level of service provided. This data is also used for performance indicator purposes. 2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
I. Data on the level of recall and awareness of the Department; II. Data on the understanding and support of the community for the Department's management strategies; and III. Data on recreational fishing participation. Data from the community surveys is also used for performance indicator reporting as part of the Annual Report. Community surveys were conducted in June 2001, May 2002, May 2003, May 2004, May 2005 and May 2006. In addition to the community surveys, stakeholder surveys were conducted in November 2002 and August 2004. These surveys target direct stakeholders and evaluate perceptions of the Department's management of its core programs and satisfaction with the level of service provided. This data is also used for performance indicator purposes. 2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
II. Data on the understanding and support of the community for the Department's management strategies; and III. Data on recreational fishing participation. Data from the community surveys is also used for performance indicator reporting as part of the Annual Report. Community surveys were conducted in June 2001, May 2002, May 2003, May 2004, May 2005 and May 2006. In addition to the community surveys, stakeholder surveys were conducted in November 2002 and August 2004. These surveys target direct stakeholders and evaluate perceptions of the Department's management of its core programs and satisfaction with the level of service provided. This data is also used for performance indicator purposes. 2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
III. Data on recreational fishing participation. Data from the community surveys is also used for performance indicator reporting as part of the Annual Report. Community surveys were conducted in June 2001, May 2002, May 2003, May 2004, May 2005 and May 2006. In addition to the community surveys, stakeholder surveys were conducted in November 2002 and August 2004. These surveys target direct stakeholders and evaluate perceptions of the Department's management of its core programs and satisfaction with the level of service provided. This data is also used for performance indicator purposes. 2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
Data from the community surveys is also used for performance indicator reporting as part of the Annual Report. Community surveys were conducted in June 2001, May 2002, May 2003, May 2004, May 2005 and May 2006. In addition to the community surveys, stakeholder surveys were conducted in November 2002 and August 2004. These surveys target direct stakeholders and evaluate perceptions of the Department's management of its core programs and satisfaction with the level of service provided. This data is also used for performance indicator purposes. 2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
Community surveys were conducted in June 2001, May 2002, May 2003, May 2004, May 2005 and May 2006. In addition to the community surveys, stakeholder surveys were conducted in November 2002 and August 2004. These surveys target direct stakeholders and evaluate perceptions of the Department's management of its core programs and satisfaction with the level of service provided. This data is also used for performance indicator purposes. 2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
In addition to the community surveys, stakeholder surveys were conducted in November 2002 and August 2004. These surveys target direct stakeholders and evaluate perceptions of the Department's management of its core programs and satisfaction with the level of service provided. This data is also used for performance indicator purposes. 2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
2). The cost of the community surveys in 2005 was $9,863.70 (GST inclusive) and 2006 was $10,703 (GST inclusive). In these cases, an external provider conducted the surveys on behalf of the Department. All other surveys (community and stakeholder) have been conducted by the Department within existing resources. 3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
3). A further stakeholder survey was conducted in August 2006. The relevance of the community survey for external reporting purposes (performance indicators) in 2007 is subject to review. 4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
4). Surveys during 2006-2007 will be conducted by the Department within existing resources.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.