❓ Question on Notice regarding the number of notices and prosecutions related to smoking regulations issued by the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection between March 1999 and May 2003. The Minister provided some data but declined to provide detailed information on each notice due to resource constraints.
AnsweredQoN 1646Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) how many prosecutions have resulted since 29 March 1999; (c) with respect to (a) - (i) on what dates were notices issued; (ii) the nature of the notice; (iii) against whom the notice was issued; (iv) what follow-up inspections were made; (v) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of inspections; and (vi) if no recommendations were made, why not; (d) with respect to (b) - (i) what were the dates of the prosecutions; (ii) what was the nature of the prosecutions; (iii) what follow-up inspections were made; (iv) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of prosecutions; and (v) if no recommendations were made, why not?
(c) with respect to (a) - (i) on what dates were notices issued; (ii) the nature of the notice; (iii) against whom the notice was issued; (iv) what follow-up inspections were made; (v) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of inspections; and (vi) if no recommendations were made, why not; (d) with respect to (b) - (i) what were the dates of the prosecutions; (ii) what was the nature of the prosecutions; (iii) what follow-up inspections were made; (iv) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of prosecutions; and (v) if no recommendations were made, why not?
(ii) the nature of the notice; (iii) against whom the notice was issued; (iv) what follow-up inspections were made; (v) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of inspections; and (vi) if no recommendations were made, why not;
(iii) against whom the notice was issued; (iv) what follow-up inspections were made; (v) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of inspections; and (vi) if no recommendations were made, why not;
(iv) what follow-up inspections were made; (v) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of inspections; and (vi) if no recommendations were made, why not;
(v) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of inspections; and (vi) if no recommendations were made, why not;
(vi) if no recommendations were made, why not;
(ii) what was the nature of the prosecutions; (iii) what follow-up inspections were made; (iv) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of prosecutions; and (v) if no recommendations were made, why not?
(iii) what follow-up inspections were made; (iv) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of prosecutions; and (v) if no recommendations were made, why not?
(iv) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of prosecutions; and (v) if no recommendations were made, why not?
(v) if no recommendations were made, why not?
(b) Nil. (c) There were 117 notices issued therefore provision of the information requested would require the expending of considerable resources. If the member wishes for me to follow through on a specific case I am happy to do so. (d) N/A.
(c) There were 117 notices issued therefore provision of the information requested would require the expending of considerable resources. If the member wishes for me to follow through on a specific case I am happy to do so. (d) N/A.
(d) N/A.
(c) with respect to (a) - (i) on what dates were notices issued; (ii) the nature of the notice; (iii) against whom the notice was issued; (iv) what follow-up inspections were made; (v) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of inspections; and (vi) if no recommendations were made, why not; (d) with respect to (b) - (i) what were the dates of the prosecutions; (ii) what was the nature of the prosecutions; (iii) what follow-up inspections were made; (iv) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of prosecutions; and (v) if no recommendations were made, why not?
(ii) the nature of the notice; (iii) against whom the notice was issued; (iv) what follow-up inspections were made; (v) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of inspections; and (vi) if no recommendations were made, why not;
(iii) against whom the notice was issued; (iv) what follow-up inspections were made; (v) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of inspections; and (vi) if no recommendations were made, why not;
(iv) what follow-up inspections were made; (v) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of inspections; and (vi) if no recommendations were made, why not;
(v) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of inspections; and (vi) if no recommendations were made, why not;
(vi) if no recommendations were made, why not;
(ii) what was the nature of the prosecutions; (iii) what follow-up inspections were made; (iv) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of prosecutions; and (v) if no recommendations were made, why not?
(iii) what follow-up inspections were made; (iv) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of prosecutions; and (v) if no recommendations were made, why not?
(iv) what recommendations were made to the industry groups as a result of prosecutions; and (v) if no recommendations were made, why not?
(v) if no recommendations were made, why not?
(b) Nil. (c) There were 117 notices issued therefore provision of the information requested would require the expending of considerable resources. If the member wishes for me to follow through on a specific case I am happy to do so. (d) N/A.
(c) There were 117 notices issued therefore provision of the information requested would require the expending of considerable resources. If the member wishes for me to follow through on a specific case I am happy to do so. (d) N/A.
(d) N/A.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
24 June 2003
Responded by
Minister for Consumer and Employment Protection
Response time
14 days
(a) 14 prohibition notices and 103 improvement notices have been issued from 29 March 1999 to 31 May 2003 under regulations dealing with smoking (Regulations 3.44A to 3.44I).
(b) Nil.
(c) There were 117 notices issued therefore provision of the information requested would require the expending of considerable resources. If the member wishes for me to follow through on a specific case I am happy to do so.
(d) N/A.
(b) Nil.
(c) There were 117 notices issued therefore provision of the information requested would require the expending of considerable resources. If the member wishes for me to follow through on a specific case I am happy to do so.
(d) N/A.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.