❓ A parliamentary question probes the authority under which the Department for Community Development contacted the new employer of a former employee, potentially in response to criticism of the Minister's stance on sex offenders. The Minister defends the department's action as a necessary measure to inform the employer of relevant circumstances.
AnsweredQoN 457Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
As a supplementary question, under what authority did the minister ring the new employer of the former employee of the Department for Community Development? Is this payback for public criticism that the minister’s stance on sex offenders is more talk than action? Ms S.M. McHALE
AnswerView source ↗
That supplementary question was the most garbled I have heard. However, the department rang the employer. This is a serious matter. It was felt incumbent upon the department to alert the employer and inform it of the circumstances of the case, and to leave it to the employer to decide whether action needed to be taken. If that had not happened, questions would have had to be asked.
Ms S.M. McHALE replied: That supplementary question was the most garbled I have heard. However, the department rang the employer. This is a serious matter. It was felt incumbent upon the department to alert the employer and inform it of the circumstances of the case, and to leave it to the employer to decide whether action needed to be taken. If that had not happened, questions would have had to be asked.
That supplementary question was the most garbled I have heard. However, the department rang the employer. This is a serious matter. It was felt incumbent upon the department to alert the employer and inform it of the circumstances of the case, and to leave it to the employer to decide whether action needed to be taken. If that had not happened, questions would have had to be asked.
Ms S.M. McHALE replied: That supplementary question was the most garbled I have heard. However, the department rang the employer. This is a serious matter. It was felt incumbent upon the department to alert the employer and inform it of the circumstances of the case, and to leave it to the employer to decide whether action needed to be taken. If that had not happened, questions would have had to be asked.
That supplementary question was the most garbled I have heard. However, the department rang the employer. This is a serious matter. It was felt incumbent upon the department to alert the employer and inform it of the circumstances of the case, and to leave it to the employer to decide whether action needed to be taken. If that had not happened, questions would have had to be asked.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.