❓ Mr. Buswell asked about the sale of government assets valued over $500,000 by the Department of Local Government and Regional Development, the Department of Fisheries, and the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions. The answer indicates that no assets exceeding that value were sold by these entities.
AnsweredQoN 1863Legislative Assembly
Asked
20 March 2007
Member
Portfolio
Regional Development; Fisheries; the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne
QuestionView source ↗
(a) name and nature of the asset; (b) date sold; (c) nature of sale and name of buyer; (d) proceeds received from the asset; (e) associated revenue from the sale, such as stamp duty; (f) the application of the funds received; and (g) any associated costs incurred in the sale process?
(b) date sold; (c) nature of sale and name of buyer; (d) proceeds received from the asset; (e) associated revenue from the sale, such as stamp duty; (f) the application of the funds received; and (g) any associated costs incurred in the sale process?
(c) nature of sale and name of buyer; (d) proceeds received from the asset; (e) associated revenue from the sale, such as stamp duty; (f) the application of the funds received; and (g) any associated costs incurred in the sale process?
(d) proceeds received from the asset; (e) associated revenue from the sale, such as stamp duty; (f) the application of the funds received; and (g) any associated costs incurred in the sale process?
(e) associated revenue from the sale, such as stamp duty; (f) the application of the funds received; and (g) any associated costs incurred in the sale process?
(f) the application of the funds received; and (g) any associated costs incurred in the sale process?
(g) any associated costs incurred in the sale process?
(a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable For the Department of Fisheries, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
(b) - (g) Not applicable For the Department of Fisheries, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
For the Department of Fisheries, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
(a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
(b) - (g) Not applicable For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
(a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
(b) - (g) Not applicable
(b) date sold; (c) nature of sale and name of buyer; (d) proceeds received from the asset; (e) associated revenue from the sale, such as stamp duty; (f) the application of the funds received; and (g) any associated costs incurred in the sale process?
(c) nature of sale and name of buyer; (d) proceeds received from the asset; (e) associated revenue from the sale, such as stamp duty; (f) the application of the funds received; and (g) any associated costs incurred in the sale process?
(d) proceeds received from the asset; (e) associated revenue from the sale, such as stamp duty; (f) the application of the funds received; and (g) any associated costs incurred in the sale process?
(e) associated revenue from the sale, such as stamp duty; (f) the application of the funds received; and (g) any associated costs incurred in the sale process?
(f) the application of the funds received; and (g) any associated costs incurred in the sale process?
(g) any associated costs incurred in the sale process?
(a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable For the Department of Fisheries, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
(b) - (g) Not applicable For the Department of Fisheries, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
For the Department of Fisheries, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
(a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
(b) - (g) Not applicable For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows: (a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
(a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000 (b) - (g) Not applicable
(b) - (g) Not applicable
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
8 May 2007
Responded by
Minister representing the Minister for Regional Development; Fisheries; the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne
Response time
49 days
For the Department of Local Government and Regional Development, please be advised as follows:
(a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000
(b) - (g) Not applicable
For the Department of Fisheries, please be advised as follows:
(a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000
(b) - (g) Not applicable
For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows:
(a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000
(b) - (g) Not applicable
(a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000
(b) - (g) Not applicable
For the Department of Fisheries, please be advised as follows:
(a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000
(b) - (g) Not applicable
For the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne Commissions, please be advised as follows:
(a) There were no assets sold with a value over $500,000
(b) - (g) Not applicable
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.