❓ Question on Notice regarding the Rosehill Golf Course Redevelopment Plan in South Guildford, focusing on environmental impact, community consultation, and aircraft noise. The Minister provides detailed responses addressing each concern.
AnsweredQoN 2340Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Is the
Minister aware of the Rosehill Golf Course Redevelopment Plan in South
Guildford? (2) Can the Minister advise if
there has been an Environmental Impact Study done on flora and fauna on the
site: (a) if yes, what was the result of
the study; (b) if yes, is the Minister
prepared to table the report; and (c) if
no to (b), why not? (3) Can the Minister
advise if there has been community consultation with regard to this
development: (a) if yes, how and when was
the community consulted; (b) if yes, what
was the feedback from that community consultation; and (c) if not, why not? (4) Can the Minister advise if there has been an Environment Impact Study
done on noise impact in particular for aircraft noise on the proposed
development: (a) if yes, what was the
result of the study; (b) if yes, is the
Minister prepared to table the report; and (c) if no to (b), why not? (5) Can
the Minister advise if the Airports Authority have been consulted with regard
to potential aircraft noise issues affecting this development: (a) if yes, what was the Airports Authority’s
response to the impact of potential aircraft noise to future residents living
in this development; (b) if not, will the
Airports Authority be requested to comment on the potential noise issues
related to this development; and (c) if
not, why not? (6) What impact will
proposed changes to runways have on the development? (7) Can the Minister advise whether he or his
department have been advised whether the Airports Authority support the
development of Rosehill and, if so, what has been communicated to him or his
department and on what dates? (8) Has a
Strategic Environmental Assessment been taken on this development and, if so,
what are the details?
Minister aware of the Rosehill Golf Course Redevelopment Plan in South
Guildford? (2) Can the Minister advise if
there has been an Environmental Impact Study done on flora and fauna on the
site: (a) if yes, what was the result of
the study; (b) if yes, is the Minister
prepared to table the report; and (c) if
no to (b), why not? (3) Can the Minister
advise if there has been community consultation with regard to this
development: (a) if yes, how and when was
the community consulted; (b) if yes, what
was the feedback from that community consultation; and (c) if not, why not? (4) Can the Minister advise if there has been an Environment Impact Study
done on noise impact in particular for aircraft noise on the proposed
development: (a) if yes, what was the
result of the study; (b) if yes, is the
Minister prepared to table the report; and (c) if no to (b), why not? (5) Can
the Minister advise if the Airports Authority have been consulted with regard
to potential aircraft noise issues affecting this development: (a) if yes, what was the Airports Authority’s
response to the impact of potential aircraft noise to future residents living
in this development; (b) if not, will the
Airports Authority be requested to comment on the potential noise issues
related to this development; and (c) if
not, why not? (6) What impact will
proposed changes to runways have on the development? (7) Can the Minister advise whether he or his
department have been advised whether the Airports Authority support the
development of Rosehill and, if so, what has been communicated to him or his
department and on what dates? (8) Has a
Strategic Environmental Assessment been taken on this development and, if so,
what are the details?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
12 August 2014
Responded by
Minister for Planning
Response time
63 days
Answer
(1)
Yes
(2) (a)
An Environmental Assessment Report, which considered flora and fauna impacts, was lodged with the amendment application by the proponent. The Environmental Protection Authority has determined that the amendment was not required to undergo
a formal environmental assessment.
(b-c)
The Environmental Assessment Report is not a WAPC document. It is recommended that the proponent be contacted for the report.
(3) (a)
Proposed MRS
amendment
No. 1266/57 - Rosehill Golf Course Redevelopment
was advertised for public submissions from 27 May to 1 August 2014. A notice was
placed in The West Australian and a local newspaper circulating in the district. The amendment
was
on display at the City of Swan, Shire of Kalamunda, Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) offices and State Reference Library and
was
available to view on the WAPC's website.
(b) The submission period closed on the 1 August 2014.
As per normal process, a
'Report on Submissions' for the amendment is currently being prepared
by
the WAPC.
(c) Not applicable
(4) (a)
An Aircraft Noise Assessment was lodged with the amendment application by the proponent. The conclusions of the study were consistent with WAPC draft State
Planning Policy 5.1 - Land Use Planning in the Vicinity of Perth Airport proposing residential development within the 20 to 25 ANEF contours, is subject to conditions (those being development restricted to Residential Density Code R20, memorials on titles advising of noise issues and noise attenuation in residences). It did not propose
residential development above the 25 ANEF contour.
(b-c)
The Aircraft Noise Assessment is not a WAPC document. It is recommended that the proponent be contacted for the report.
(5)
Yes. Perth Airport Pty Ltd was consulted as part of the preliminary referral process which is undertaken by the WAPC for all MRS Amendments prior to initiation.
(a) Perth Airport Pty Ltd
expressed
concerns about the potential impact of noise from its
operations and advised that, should the amendment be approved, memorials on the
titles would be required for all new lots.
(b-c)
Not applicable
(6)
The Perth Airport Preliminary Draft Master Plan 2014 indicates that the proposed
runway changes will increase the extent of the 20 ANEF and above contour area
affecting Rosehill.
(7)
The Department of Planning and I
are aware of the concerns of
Perth Airport Pty Ltd
through
the
preliminary referral process undertaken from 28 June 2013 to 25 February 2014
.
(8)
P
rior to an MRS amendment being
finalised
, the proponent is not required to obtain approval under the (Federal)
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999
, t
his can occur at any stage of the planning process.
(1)
Yes
(2) (a)
An Environmental Assessment Report, which considered flora and fauna impacts, was lodged with the amendment application by the proponent. The Environmental Protection Authority has determined that the amendment was not required to undergo
a formal environmental assessment.
(b-c)
The Environmental Assessment Report is not a WAPC document. It is recommended that the proponent be contacted for the report.
(3) (a)
Proposed MRS
amendment
No. 1266/57 - Rosehill Golf Course Redevelopment
was advertised for public submissions from 27 May to 1 August 2014. A notice was
placed in The West Australian and a local newspaper circulating in the district. The amendment
was
on display at the City of Swan, Shire of Kalamunda, Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) offices and State Reference Library and
was
available to view on the WAPC's website.
(b) The submission period closed on the 1 August 2014.
As per normal process, a
'Report on Submissions' for the amendment is currently being prepared
by
the WAPC.
(c) Not applicable
(4) (a)
An Aircraft Noise Assessment was lodged with the amendment application by the proponent. The conclusions of the study were consistent with WAPC draft State
Planning Policy 5.1 - Land Use Planning in the Vicinity of Perth Airport proposing residential development within the 20 to 25 ANEF contours, is subject to conditions (those being development restricted to Residential Density Code R20, memorials on titles advising of noise issues and noise attenuation in residences). It did not propose
residential development above the 25 ANEF contour.
(b-c)
The Aircraft Noise Assessment is not a WAPC document. It is recommended that the proponent be contacted for the report.
(5)
Yes. Perth Airport Pty Ltd was consulted as part of the preliminary referral process which is undertaken by the WAPC for all MRS Amendments prior to initiation.
(a) Perth Airport Pty Ltd
expressed
concerns about the potential impact of noise from its
operations and advised that, should the amendment be approved, memorials on the
titles would be required for all new lots.
(b-c)
Not applicable
(6)
The Perth Airport Preliminary Draft Master Plan 2014 indicates that the proposed
runway changes will increase the extent of the 20 ANEF and above contour area
affecting Rosehill.
(7)
The Department of Planning and I
are aware of the concerns of
Perth Airport Pty Ltd
through
the
preliminary referral process undertaken from 28 June 2013 to 25 February 2014
.
(8)
P
rior to an MRS amendment being
finalised
, the proponent is not required to obtain approval under the (Federal)
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999
, t
his can occur at any stage of the planning process.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.