❓ Question regarding contaminated site classification of land in the Erindale Grove development, Gwelup. The Minister confirms that several lots are classified as "remediated for restricted use" since February 2010, with details in a tabled document.
AnsweredQoN 429Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
ERINDALE GROVE DEVELOPMENT — CONTAMINATED SITE CLASSIFICATION
(1) Is any of the land in or around the Erindale Grove development in Gwelup classified as a contaminated site? (2) If yes, when was the classification put on the site and why? (3) If no, has any land in question been classified as a contaminated site in the past? (4) If yes, when and for what reason was the classification removed? Hon DONNA FARAGHER
(1) Is any of the land in or around the Erindale Grove development in Gwelup classified as a contaminated site? (2) If yes, when was the classification put on the site and why? (3) If no, has any land in question been classified as a contaminated site in the past? (4) If yes, when and for what reason was the classification removed? Hon DONNA FARAGHER
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Lots 1, 11, 71 and 73 on North Beach Road, Gwelup, are classified as “remediated for restricted use”. (2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
(2) If yes, when was the classification put on the site and why? (3) If no, has any land in question been classified as a contaminated site in the past? (4) If yes, when and for what reason was the classification removed? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Lots 1, 11, 71 and 73 on North Beach Road, Gwelup, are classified as “remediated for restricted use”. (2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
(3) If no, has any land in question been classified as a contaminated site in the past? (4) If yes, when and for what reason was the classification removed? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Lots 1, 11, 71 and 73 on North Beach Road, Gwelup, are classified as “remediated for restricted use”. (2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
(4) If yes, when and for what reason was the classification removed? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Lots 1, 11, 71 and 73 on North Beach Road, Gwelup, are classified as “remediated for restricted use”. (2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Lots 1, 11, 71 and 73 on North Beach Road, Gwelup, are classified as “remediated for restricted use”. (2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Lots 1, 11, 71 and 73 on North Beach Road, Gwelup, are classified as “remediated for restricted use”. (2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
(1) Lots 1, 11, 71 and 73 on North Beach Road, Gwelup, are classified as “remediated for restricted use”. (2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
(2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
[See paper 2226.]
(2) If yes, when was the classification put on the site and why? (3) If no, has any land in question been classified as a contaminated site in the past? (4) If yes, when and for what reason was the classification removed? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Lots 1, 11, 71 and 73 on North Beach Road, Gwelup, are classified as “remediated for restricted use”. (2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
(3) If no, has any land in question been classified as a contaminated site in the past? (4) If yes, when and for what reason was the classification removed? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Lots 1, 11, 71 and 73 on North Beach Road, Gwelup, are classified as “remediated for restricted use”. (2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
(4) If yes, when and for what reason was the classification removed? Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Lots 1, 11, 71 and 73 on North Beach Road, Gwelup, are classified as “remediated for restricted use”. (2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
Hon DONNA FARAGHER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Lots 1, 11, 71 and 73 on North Beach Road, Gwelup, are classified as “remediated for restricted use”. (2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) Lots 1, 11, 71 and 73 on North Beach Road, Gwelup, are classified as “remediated for restricted use”. (2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
(1) Lots 1, 11, 71 and 73 on North Beach Road, Gwelup, are classified as “remediated for restricted use”. (2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
(2)–(4) These lots were classified on 22 February 2010. The reasons for this classification are summarised in the attached basic summary of records, which is the same for all of these lots. I seek leave to table the attached document. The classification has not been removed. The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
The PRESIDENT : That document is tabled; you do not need to seek leave. [See paper 2226.]
[See paper 2226.]
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.