❓ Hon Peter Foss questions the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure regarding public submissions received on the deletion of the Fremantle Eastern Bypass (FEB) from the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS). The questions seek detailed information on the number of submissions, petitions, and community groups for and against the deletion.
AnsweredQoN 711Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the Minister’s decision to delete the Fremantle Eastern Bypass (FEB) from the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS), and the public submissions received after the initial closing date of March 12 2003, and by the extended closing date of April 7 2003. Can the Minister please advise -
(1) How many individual submissions were received by the WAPC after the initial closing date of March 12 2003 and by the extending closing date of April 7 2003?
(2) Of these, how many -
(a) were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS;
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS; and
(c) sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS?
(3) Of submissions received after the initial closing date of March 12 2003 and by the extending closing date of April 7 2003, have any community action groups sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS and what number of people do they claim to represent?
(4) How many petitions were received by the WAPC after the initial closing date of March 12 2003 and by the extending closing date of April 7 2003, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions?
(5) Of these petitions, how many -
(a) were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions, and how many people did they represent; and
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions, and how many people did they represent?
(1) How many individual submissions were received by the WAPC after the initial closing date of March 12 2003 and by the extending closing date of April 7 2003?
(2) Of these, how many -
(a) were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS;
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS; and
(c) sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS?
(3) Of submissions received after the initial closing date of March 12 2003 and by the extending closing date of April 7 2003, have any community action groups sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS and what number of people do they claim to represent?
(4) How many petitions were received by the WAPC after the initial closing date of March 12 2003 and by the extending closing date of April 7 2003, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions?
(5) Of these petitions, how many -
(a) were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions, and how many people did they represent; and
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions, and how many people did they represent?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
12 June 2003
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Response time
37 days
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS; and (c) sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS?
(c) sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS?
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions, and how many people did they represent?
1. 5108 individual submissions were received in the period between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date of 7 April 2003. 2. Of the submissions received between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003: a) 978 were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS; b) 4124 opposed deleting the FEB; and c) 301 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. Between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003 a total of 5 action groups* sought to attend hearings, representing 85 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
2. Of the submissions received between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003: a) 978 were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS; b) 4124 opposed deleting the FEB; and c) 301 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. Between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003 a total of 5 action groups* sought to attend hearings, representing 85 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
a) 978 were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS; b) 4124 opposed deleting the FEB; and c) 301 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. Between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003 a total of 5 action groups* sought to attend hearings, representing 85 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
b) 4124 opposed deleting the FEB; and c) 301 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. Between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003 a total of 5 action groups* sought to attend hearings, representing 85 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
c) 301 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. Between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003 a total of 5 action groups* sought to attend hearings, representing 85 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
3. Between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003 a total of 5 action groups* sought to attend hearings, representing 85 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
· No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
· The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
· No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
(c) sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion from the MRS?
(b) opposed deleting the FEB from the MRS, and what was the total number of signatories on those petitions, and how many people did they represent?
1. 5108 individual submissions were received in the period between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date of 7 April 2003. 2. Of the submissions received between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003: a) 978 were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS; b) 4124 opposed deleting the FEB; and c) 301 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. Between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003 a total of 5 action groups* sought to attend hearings, representing 85 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
2. Of the submissions received between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003: a) 978 were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS; b) 4124 opposed deleting the FEB; and c) 301 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. Between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003 a total of 5 action groups* sought to attend hearings, representing 85 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
a) 978 were in favour of deleting the FEB from the MRS; b) 4124 opposed deleting the FEB; and c) 301 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. Between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003 a total of 5 action groups* sought to attend hearings, representing 85 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
b) 4124 opposed deleting the FEB; and c) 301 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. Between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003 a total of 5 action groups* sought to attend hearings, representing 85 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
c) 301 sought to attend hearings on the issue of the FEB deletion. 3. Between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003 a total of 5 action groups* sought to attend hearings, representing 85 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
3. Between the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and the extended closing date 7 April 2003 a total of 5 action groups* sought to attend hearings, representing 85 people. [* An action group is defined in these statistics as any individual representing 10 or more submissions] 4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
4. Three petitions were received after the initial closing date of 12 March 2003 and by the extended closing date of 7 April 2003 containing a total of 4276 signatures. 5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
5(a) Two petitions supported deletion of the FEB and contained 4035 signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
· No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent 5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
5(b) One petition opposed the deletion of the FEB and contained 241 signatures. · The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
· The WAPC is also aware of another petition opposing the deletion of the FEB that has been tabled in Parliament by Hon Mike Board MLA, Member for Murdoch, but the WAPC has not received that petition as a submission on MRS Amendment 1055/33 and does not know the final number of signatures. · No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
· No attempt has been made to cross-reference the signatures on the petitions to check for double counting, so it is not possible to answer the Member’s question about the number of people that the petitions represent.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.