❓ Hon. Matt Benson-Lidholm questions Hon. Peter Collier about a potential school-based apprenticeship system proposed by the Master Builders Association where students pay to learn. The Minister denies discussing such a proposal or receiving related correspondence.
AnsweredQoN 1025Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
MASTER BUILDERS ASSOCIATION — SCHOOL-BASED APPRENTICESHIP SYSTEM
(1) Has the minister met with the Master Builders Association to discuss its proposal for a new school-based apprenticeship system in which students pay to learn a trade in a classroom rather than getting paid to learn on the job? (2) Has the minister received any written correspondence in relation to the proposal? (3) If yes to (2), will the minister table the correspondence; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER
(1) Has the minister met with the Master Builders Association to discuss its proposal for a new school-based apprenticeship system in which students pay to learn a trade in a classroom rather than getting paid to learn on the job? (2) Has the minister received any written correspondence in relation to the proposal? (3) If yes to (2), will the minister table the correspondence; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I met with the Master Builders Association on 29 October 2008. However, a proposal in which students pay to learn a trade in a classroom rather than getting paid to learn on the job was not mentioned. (2) No. (3) Not applicable.
(2) Has the minister received any written correspondence in relation to the proposal? (3) If yes to (2), will the minister table the correspondence; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I met with the Master Builders Association on 29 October 2008. However, a proposal in which students pay to learn a trade in a classroom rather than getting paid to learn on the job was not mentioned. (2) No. (3) Not applicable.
(3) If yes to (2), will the minister table the correspondence; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I met with the Master Builders Association on 29 October 2008. However, a proposal in which students pay to learn a trade in a classroom rather than getting paid to learn on the job was not mentioned. (2) No. (3) Not applicable.
Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I met with the Master Builders Association on 29 October 2008. However, a proposal in which students pay to learn a trade in a classroom rather than getting paid to learn on the job was not mentioned. (2) No. (3) Not applicable.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I met with the Master Builders Association on 29 October 2008. However, a proposal in which students pay to learn a trade in a classroom rather than getting paid to learn on the job was not mentioned. (2) No. (3) Not applicable.
(1) I met with the Master Builders Association on 29 October 2008. However, a proposal in which students pay to learn a trade in a classroom rather than getting paid to learn on the job was not mentioned. (2) No. (3) Not applicable.
(2) No. (3) Not applicable.
(3) Not applicable.
(2) Has the minister received any written correspondence in relation to the proposal? (3) If yes to (2), will the minister table the correspondence; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I met with the Master Builders Association on 29 October 2008. However, a proposal in which students pay to learn a trade in a classroom rather than getting paid to learn on the job was not mentioned. (2) No. (3) Not applicable.
(3) If yes to (2), will the minister table the correspondence; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I met with the Master Builders Association on 29 October 2008. However, a proposal in which students pay to learn a trade in a classroom rather than getting paid to learn on the job was not mentioned. (2) No. (3) Not applicable.
Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I met with the Master Builders Association on 29 October 2008. However, a proposal in which students pay to learn a trade in a classroom rather than getting paid to learn on the job was not mentioned. (2) No. (3) Not applicable.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) I met with the Master Builders Association on 29 October 2008. However, a proposal in which students pay to learn a trade in a classroom rather than getting paid to learn on the job was not mentioned. (2) No. (3) Not applicable.
(1) I met with the Master Builders Association on 29 October 2008. However, a proposal in which students pay to learn a trade in a classroom rather than getting paid to learn on the job was not mentioned. (2) No. (3) Not applicable.
(2) No. (3) Not applicable.
(3) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.