❓ Question on Notice regarding communication between the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure and a committee, specifically concerning submissions, evidence given by departmental officers, and any directions given to those officers. The Minister denies direct communication and states no directions were given to the officer who gave evidence.
AnsweredQoN 2938Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) if so, when and who was the committee member that the Minister spoke to; (c) has the Minister’s Department made a written submission to the committee; (d) if yes to (c), will the Minister table a copy of that submission if the committee has made it avaliable for release; (e) did officers of the Minister’s Department give evidence to the committee; (f) if yes to (e), and as their evidence was taken in open session what direction were these officers given by the Minister or the Department before appearing before the Committee; (g) who gave these directions; and (h) under whose authority were these directions given?
(c) has the Minister’s Department made a written submission to the committee; (d) if yes to (c), will the Minister table a copy of that submission if the committee has made it avaliable for release; (e) did officers of the Minister’s Department give evidence to the committee; (f) if yes to (e), and as their evidence was taken in open session what direction were these officers given by the Minister or the Department before appearing before the Committee; (g) who gave these directions; and (h) under whose authority were these directions given?
(d) if yes to (c), will the Minister table a copy of that submission if the committee has made it avaliable for release; (e) did officers of the Minister’s Department give evidence to the committee; (f) if yes to (e), and as their evidence was taken in open session what direction were these officers given by the Minister or the Department before appearing before the Committee; (g) who gave these directions; and (h) under whose authority were these directions given?
(e) did officers of the Minister’s Department give evidence to the committee; (f) if yes to (e), and as their evidence was taken in open session what direction were these officers given by the Minister or the Department before appearing before the Committee; (g) who gave these directions; and (h) under whose authority were these directions given?
(f) if yes to (e), and as their evidence was taken in open session what direction were these officers given by the Minister or the Department before appearing before the Committee; (g) who gave these directions; and (h) under whose authority were these directions given?
(g) who gave these directions; and (h) under whose authority were these directions given?
(h) under whose authority were these directions given?
(b) N/A (c) No (d) N/A (e) Yes, Mr Ray Stokes gave evidence on 10 March 2004 and the transcript of evidence is on the public record and available on the Public Accounts Committee page of the Parliament website. (f) No directions were given. (g) N/A (h) N/A
(c) No (d) N/A (e) Yes, Mr Ray Stokes gave evidence on 10 March 2004 and the transcript of evidence is on the public record and available on the Public Accounts Committee page of the Parliament website. (f) No directions were given. (g) N/A (h) N/A
(d) N/A (e) Yes, Mr Ray Stokes gave evidence on 10 March 2004 and the transcript of evidence is on the public record and available on the Public Accounts Committee page of the Parliament website. (f) No directions were given. (g) N/A (h) N/A
(e) Yes, Mr Ray Stokes gave evidence on 10 March 2004 and the transcript of evidence is on the public record and available on the Public Accounts Committee page of the Parliament website. (f) No directions were given. (g) N/A (h) N/A
(f) No directions were given. (g) N/A (h) N/A
(g) N/A (h) N/A
(h) N/A
(c) has the Minister’s Department made a written submission to the committee; (d) if yes to (c), will the Minister table a copy of that submission if the committee has made it avaliable for release; (e) did officers of the Minister’s Department give evidence to the committee; (f) if yes to (e), and as their evidence was taken in open session what direction were these officers given by the Minister or the Department before appearing before the Committee; (g) who gave these directions; and (h) under whose authority were these directions given?
(d) if yes to (c), will the Minister table a copy of that submission if the committee has made it avaliable for release; (e) did officers of the Minister’s Department give evidence to the committee; (f) if yes to (e), and as their evidence was taken in open session what direction were these officers given by the Minister or the Department before appearing before the Committee; (g) who gave these directions; and (h) under whose authority were these directions given?
(e) did officers of the Minister’s Department give evidence to the committee; (f) if yes to (e), and as their evidence was taken in open session what direction were these officers given by the Minister or the Department before appearing before the Committee; (g) who gave these directions; and (h) under whose authority were these directions given?
(f) if yes to (e), and as their evidence was taken in open session what direction were these officers given by the Minister or the Department before appearing before the Committee; (g) who gave these directions; and (h) under whose authority were these directions given?
(g) who gave these directions; and (h) under whose authority were these directions given?
(h) under whose authority were these directions given?
(b) N/A (c) No (d) N/A (e) Yes, Mr Ray Stokes gave evidence on 10 March 2004 and the transcript of evidence is on the public record and available on the Public Accounts Committee page of the Parliament website. (f) No directions were given. (g) N/A (h) N/A
(c) No (d) N/A (e) Yes, Mr Ray Stokes gave evidence on 10 March 2004 and the transcript of evidence is on the public record and available on the Public Accounts Committee page of the Parliament website. (f) No directions were given. (g) N/A (h) N/A
(d) N/A (e) Yes, Mr Ray Stokes gave evidence on 10 March 2004 and the transcript of evidence is on the public record and available on the Public Accounts Committee page of the Parliament website. (f) No directions were given. (g) N/A (h) N/A
(e) Yes, Mr Ray Stokes gave evidence on 10 March 2004 and the transcript of evidence is on the public record and available on the Public Accounts Committee page of the Parliament website. (f) No directions were given. (g) N/A (h) N/A
(f) No directions were given. (g) N/A (h) N/A
(g) N/A (h) N/A
(h) N/A
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
14 September 2004
Responded by
Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Response time
91 days
(a) No
(b) N/A
(c) No
(d) N/A
(e) Yes, Mr Ray Stokes gave evidence on 10 March 2004 and the transcript of evidence is on the public record and available on the Public Accounts Committee page of the Parliament website.
(f) No directions were given.
(g) N/A
(h) N/A
(b) N/A
(c) No
(d) N/A
(e) Yes, Mr Ray Stokes gave evidence on 10 March 2004 and the transcript of evidence is on the public record and available on the Public Accounts Committee page of the Parliament website.
(f) No directions were given.
(g) N/A
(h) N/A
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.