❓ Mrs. Hughes asks about the environmental impacts of the Kimberley canal proposal outlined in the Appleyard report. Mr. McGowan responds, highlighting the report's findings of potential environmental disaster, including damage to fauna, flora, hydrology, national parks, and the spread of cane toads.
AnsweredQoN 195Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
APPLEYARD REPORT
I refer to the Appleyard report, “Options for bringing water to PERTH from the KIMBERLEY: An Independent Review” released yesterday. Is the minister aware of the environmental impacts that would result from pursuing the canal option? Mr M. McGOWAN
I refer to the Appleyard report, “Options for bringing water to PERTH from the KIMBERLEY: An Independent Review” released yesterday. Is the minister aware of the environmental impacts that would result from pursuing the canal option? Mr M. McGOWAN
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for the question. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Order, members! Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call to order the members for Roe, Cottesloe and South Perth. Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr M. McGOWAN replied: I thank the member for the question. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Order, members! Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call to order the members for Roe, Cottesloe and South Perth. Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
I thank the member for the question. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Order, members! Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call to order the members for Roe, Cottesloe and South Perth. Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Order, members! Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call to order the members for Roe, Cottesloe and South Perth. Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
The SPEAKER : Order, members! Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call to order the members for Roe, Cottesloe and South Perth. Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call to order the members for Roe, Cottesloe and South Perth. Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
The SPEAKER : I call to order the members for Roe, Cottesloe and South Perth. Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr M. McGOWAN replied: I thank the member for the question. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Order, members! Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call to order the members for Roe, Cottesloe and South Perth. Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
I thank the member for the question. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Order, members! Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call to order the members for Roe, Cottesloe and South Perth. Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Order, members! Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call to order the members for Roe, Cottesloe and South Perth. Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
The SPEAKER : Order, members! Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call to order the members for Roe, Cottesloe and South Perth. Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call to order the members for Roe, Cottesloe and South Perth. Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
The SPEAKER : I call to order the members for Roe, Cottesloe and South Perth. Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr M. McGOWAN : I thank the member for the question. Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Professor Appleyard’s independent report points out that the canal proposal would be not only a financial catastrophe, but also an environmental disaster. He says that there would be a very high risk of extensive, irreversible environmental damage as a result of building a canal. He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic - Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
The SPEAKER : I call the member for South Perth to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr M. McGOWAN : He points out in the report that there would be a dramatic impact on fauna and flora along the route of the canal, a dramatic impact on surface hydrology, movement of fauna across the region in the area of the canal, an impact upon national parks and A-class nature reserves along the route of the canal, and a potential impact on the Ramsar Convention’s list of wetlands. In addition, 33 000 hectares of land would be cleared to build the canal. Of course, as the water was transported along the route, 200 gigalitres of water would be lost that this state - Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order. Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr P.D. Omodei interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
The SPEAKER : I call the Leader of the Opposition to order for the second time. Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr M. McGOWAN : We would lose 200 gigalitres of water along the route every year, which this state can ill afford to lose, and it would be environmentally disastrous. It gets worse. This report directly refers to the canal being an opportunity for what it terms dangerous biota to move along its length. Dangerous biota is basically cane toads. Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Several members interjected. Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr C.J. Barnett : Cane toads coming down the canal! Cane toads in swimmers surfing along the canal! Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr M. McGOWAN : The member for Cottesloe thinks he is not only C.Y. O’Connor, but also Ferdinand de Lesseps. Now he thinks he is David Suzuki. He knows everything about engineering and the environment. The member for Cottesloe knows everything about these things. There is a prospect that cane toads will come from the north of the state into backyards and the wilderness areas and wetlands of the southern part of this state under this proposal. Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
The SPEAKER : I call the member for Cottesloe to order again and the member for Roe. Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Mr M. McGOWAN : This report refers directly to that prospect. Anyone who has seen cane toads will understand that they are an ecological disaster. We do not need a cane toad autobahn transporting them from the north to the south of the state. This canal would be a river of ecological ruin. Fortunately, the people of the state recognised that at the last state election when they gave us a thumping victory.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.