❓ Dr. Thomas asks the Attorney General about the delay in the Patane v Brain case (CC/506/2005) before the State Administrative Tribunal, specifically why it's exceeding the normal 90-day timeframe. The Attorney General's answer indicates the delay was due to incomplete submissions until August 5, 2005.
AnsweredQoN 435Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Will the Attorney General advise when an outcome is likely for case number CC/506 of 2005, Patane v Brain, currently before the State Administrative Tribunal?
(2) Will the Attorney General advise why, given the receipt of necessary documents, the outcome has taken longer that the 90 day’s time frame which is normal for such cases?
(2) Will the Attorney General advise why, given the receipt of necessary documents, the outcome has taken longer that the 90 day’s time frame which is normal for such cases?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
11 October 2005
Response time
27 days
2) The finalisation of submissions was not complete until 5 August 2005.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.