❓ A WA parliamentary question regarding prisoner numbers and sleeping arrangements in regional prisons. The Minister provides current prisoner numbers but deflects on capacity and bed type definitions.
AnsweredQoN 791Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
regional prisons — PRISONER NUMBERS
I refer to conditions in regional prisons across Western Australia. (1) What are the current prisoner numbers and recommended capacities for the following prisons — (a) Broome; (b) Roebourne; (c) Greenough; (d) Eastern goldfields; (e) Bunbury; and (f) Albany? (2) Are prisoners in any of these prisons sleeping on mattresses on cell floors? (3) If so, how many prisoners are not sleeping on normal standard prison beds? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN
I refer to conditions in regional prisons across Western Australia. (1) What are the current prisoner numbers and recommended capacities for the following prisons — (a) Broome; (b) Roebourne; (c) Greenough; (d) Eastern goldfields; (e) Bunbury; and (f) Albany? (2) Are prisoners in any of these prisons sleeping on mattresses on cell floors? (3) If so, how many prisoners are not sleeping on normal standard prison beds? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The Minister for Corrective Services advises — (1) The term “recommended capacity” is not a term recognised or used by the Department of Corrective Services in calculating capacities of prison infrastructure. Rather, prison infrastructure is presently assessed on the basis of consideration of original design capacity and present modified capacity. If that is what the member requires, we will retrieve that data pursuant to a separate question confirming that this is the information sought. Prisoner numbers as at 19 August 2009 are Broome, 89; Roebourne, 181; Greenough, 259; Eastern goldfields, 108; Bunbury, 321; and Albany, 275. (2) Yes. (3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
(1) What are the current prisoner numbers and recommended capacities for the following prisons — (a) Broome; (b) Roebourne; (c) Greenough; (d) Eastern goldfields; (e) Bunbury; and (f) Albany? (2) Are prisoners in any of these prisons sleeping on mattresses on cell floors? (3) If so, how many prisoners are not sleeping on normal standard prison beds? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The Minister for Corrective Services advises — (1) The term “recommended capacity” is not a term recognised or used by the Department of Corrective Services in calculating capacities of prison infrastructure. Rather, prison infrastructure is presently assessed on the basis of consideration of original design capacity and present modified capacity. If that is what the member requires, we will retrieve that data pursuant to a separate question confirming that this is the information sought. Prisoner numbers as at 19 August 2009 are Broome, 89; Roebourne, 181; Greenough, 259; Eastern goldfields, 108; Bunbury, 321; and Albany, 275. (2) Yes. (3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
(b) Roebourne; (c) Greenough; (d) Eastern goldfields; (e) Bunbury; and (f) Albany?
(c) Greenough; (d) Eastern goldfields; (e) Bunbury; and (f) Albany?
(d) Eastern goldfields; (e) Bunbury; and (f) Albany?
(e) Bunbury; and (f) Albany?
(f) Albany?
(3) If so, how many prisoners are not sleeping on normal standard prison beds? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The Minister for Corrective Services advises — (1) The term “recommended capacity” is not a term recognised or used by the Department of Corrective Services in calculating capacities of prison infrastructure. Rather, prison infrastructure is presently assessed on the basis of consideration of original design capacity and present modified capacity. If that is what the member requires, we will retrieve that data pursuant to a separate question confirming that this is the information sought. Prisoner numbers as at 19 August 2009 are Broome, 89; Roebourne, 181; Greenough, 259; Eastern goldfields, 108; Bunbury, 321; and Albany, 275. (2) Yes. (3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The Minister for Corrective Services advises — (1) The term “recommended capacity” is not a term recognised or used by the Department of Corrective Services in calculating capacities of prison infrastructure. Rather, prison infrastructure is presently assessed on the basis of consideration of original design capacity and present modified capacity. If that is what the member requires, we will retrieve that data pursuant to a separate question confirming that this is the information sought. Prisoner numbers as at 19 August 2009 are Broome, 89; Roebourne, 181; Greenough, 259; Eastern goldfields, 108; Bunbury, 321; and Albany, 275. (2) Yes. (3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The Minister for Corrective Services advises — (1) The term “recommended capacity” is not a term recognised or used by the Department of Corrective Services in calculating capacities of prison infrastructure. Rather, prison infrastructure is presently assessed on the basis of consideration of original design capacity and present modified capacity. If that is what the member requires, we will retrieve that data pursuant to a separate question confirming that this is the information sought. Prisoner numbers as at 19 August 2009 are Broome, 89; Roebourne, 181; Greenough, 259; Eastern goldfields, 108; Bunbury, 321; and Albany, 275. (2) Yes. (3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
(1) The term “recommended capacity” is not a term recognised or used by the Department of Corrective Services in calculating capacities of prison infrastructure. Rather, prison infrastructure is presently assessed on the basis of consideration of original design capacity and present modified capacity. If that is what the member requires, we will retrieve that data pursuant to a separate question confirming that this is the information sought. Prisoner numbers as at 19 August 2009 are Broome, 89; Roebourne, 181; Greenough, 259; Eastern goldfields, 108; Bunbury, 321; and Albany, 275. (2) Yes. (3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
(2) Yes. (3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
(3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
(1) What are the current prisoner numbers and recommended capacities for the following prisons — (a) Broome; (b) Roebourne; (c) Greenough; (d) Eastern goldfields; (e) Bunbury; and (f) Albany? (2) Are prisoners in any of these prisons sleeping on mattresses on cell floors? (3) If so, how many prisoners are not sleeping on normal standard prison beds? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The Minister for Corrective Services advises — (1) The term “recommended capacity” is not a term recognised or used by the Department of Corrective Services in calculating capacities of prison infrastructure. Rather, prison infrastructure is presently assessed on the basis of consideration of original design capacity and present modified capacity. If that is what the member requires, we will retrieve that data pursuant to a separate question confirming that this is the information sought. Prisoner numbers as at 19 August 2009 are Broome, 89; Roebourne, 181; Greenough, 259; Eastern goldfields, 108; Bunbury, 321; and Albany, 275. (2) Yes. (3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
(b) Roebourne; (c) Greenough; (d) Eastern goldfields; (e) Bunbury; and (f) Albany?
(c) Greenough; (d) Eastern goldfields; (e) Bunbury; and (f) Albany?
(d) Eastern goldfields; (e) Bunbury; and (f) Albany?
(e) Bunbury; and (f) Albany?
(f) Albany?
(3) If so, how many prisoners are not sleeping on normal standard prison beds? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The Minister for Corrective Services advises — (1) The term “recommended capacity” is not a term recognised or used by the Department of Corrective Services in calculating capacities of prison infrastructure. Rather, prison infrastructure is presently assessed on the basis of consideration of original design capacity and present modified capacity. If that is what the member requires, we will retrieve that data pursuant to a separate question confirming that this is the information sought. Prisoner numbers as at 19 August 2009 are Broome, 89; Roebourne, 181; Greenough, 259; Eastern goldfields, 108; Bunbury, 321; and Albany, 275. (2) Yes. (3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The Minister for Corrective Services advises — (1) The term “recommended capacity” is not a term recognised or used by the Department of Corrective Services in calculating capacities of prison infrastructure. Rather, prison infrastructure is presently assessed on the basis of consideration of original design capacity and present modified capacity. If that is what the member requires, we will retrieve that data pursuant to a separate question confirming that this is the information sought. Prisoner numbers as at 19 August 2009 are Broome, 89; Roebourne, 181; Greenough, 259; Eastern goldfields, 108; Bunbury, 321; and Albany, 275. (2) Yes. (3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of this question. The Minister for Corrective Services advises — (1) The term “recommended capacity” is not a term recognised or used by the Department of Corrective Services in calculating capacities of prison infrastructure. Rather, prison infrastructure is presently assessed on the basis of consideration of original design capacity and present modified capacity. If that is what the member requires, we will retrieve that data pursuant to a separate question confirming that this is the information sought. Prisoner numbers as at 19 August 2009 are Broome, 89; Roebourne, 181; Greenough, 259; Eastern goldfields, 108; Bunbury, 321; and Albany, 275. (2) Yes. (3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
(1) The term “recommended capacity” is not a term recognised or used by the Department of Corrective Services in calculating capacities of prison infrastructure. Rather, prison infrastructure is presently assessed on the basis of consideration of original design capacity and present modified capacity. If that is what the member requires, we will retrieve that data pursuant to a separate question confirming that this is the information sought. Prisoner numbers as at 19 August 2009 are Broome, 89; Roebourne, 181; Greenough, 259; Eastern goldfields, 108; Bunbury, 321; and Albany, 275. (2) Yes. (3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
(2) Yes. (3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
(3) The term “normal standard prison bed” is not a term used by the Department of Corrective Services for the purposes of categorising or counting prison bed types, which can be of a wide variety. For instance, the prison beds in service at Bungarun work camp are of a very different type from those in use at Acacia, and while some people in Perth may not view these beds as necessarily normal, each might be described as a standard prison bed.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.