A parliamentary question regarding comments made by the police union about the DPP's knowledge of DNA testing in the Dante Arthurs case. The Attorney General deflects responsibility for explaining the union's statements.

AnsweredQoN 651Legislative Assembly
Asked
12 November 2007
Portfolio
Attorney General

QuestionView source ↗

DANTE ARTHURS - POLICE INVESTIGATION
I ask a supplementary question. I do not think the Attorney General answered the last question. How does the Attorney General explain comments by the police union - Mr J.A. McGinty : Ask the police union! Don’t ask me! Mr P.D. OMODEI : - that the DPP knew that DNA testing was not conducted on Dante Arthurs’ clothing? Mr J.A. McGINTY

AnswerView source ↗

How do I explain what somebody else has said that has no relationship to me?
Mr J.A. McGinty : Ask the police union! Don’t ask me! Mr P.D. OMODEI : - that the DPP knew that DNA testing was not conducted on Dante Arthurs’ clothing? Mr J.A. McGINTY replied: How do I explain what somebody else has said that has no relationship to me?
Mr P.D. OMODEI : - that the DPP knew that DNA testing was not conducted on Dante Arthurs’ clothing? Mr J.A. McGINTY replied: How do I explain what somebody else has said that has no relationship to me?
Mr J.A. McGINTY replied: How do I explain what somebody else has said that has no relationship to me?
How do I explain what somebody else has said that has no relationship to me?

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more