❓ WA Police Service conducted an Administration Functions Review (AFR) starting May 2001, led by Deputy Commissioner K Porter. Initial reports are complete but not tabled. 48 positions reallocated to front line policing as a result.
AnsweredQoN 1785Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) if not, why not; (c) if yes, when was this review undertaken and when was it completed; (d) who headed the review; (e) has the report been completed in relation to this review; (f) if not, why not; (g) if yes, will the Minister table a copy of that report; and (h) how many officers have been freed up and returned to front line duties as a direct result of this review?
(c) if yes, when was this review undertaken and when was it completed; (d) who headed the review; (e) has the report been completed in relation to this review; (f) if not, why not; (g) if yes, will the Minister table a copy of that report; and (h) how many officers have been freed up and returned to front line duties as a direct result of this review?
(d) who headed the review; (e) has the report been completed in relation to this review; (f) if not, why not; (g) if yes, will the Minister table a copy of that report; and (h) how many officers have been freed up and returned to front line duties as a direct result of this review?
(e) has the report been completed in relation to this review; (f) if not, why not; (g) if yes, will the Minister table a copy of that report; and (h) how many officers have been freed up and returned to front line duties as a direct result of this review?
(f) if not, why not; (g) if yes, will the Minister table a copy of that report; and (h) how many officers have been freed up and returned to front line duties as a direct result of this review?
(g) if yes, will the Minister table a copy of that report; and (h) how many officers have been freed up and returned to front line duties as a direct result of this review?
(h) how many officers have been freed up and returned to front line duties as a direct result of this review?
(b) N/A (c) The Administration Functions Review commenced in May 2001. (d) The Project Sponsor was Mr K Porter, Deputy Commissioner (Administration). (e) Initial reports outlining findings and recommendations relating to all portfolios and directorates within the Police Service have been completed. However, further work and assessment is still being conducted. (f) N/A (g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table. (h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(c) The Administration Functions Review commenced in May 2001. (d) The Project Sponsor was Mr K Porter, Deputy Commissioner (Administration). (e) Initial reports outlining findings and recommendations relating to all portfolios and directorates within the Police Service have been completed. However, further work and assessment is still being conducted. (f) N/A (g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table. (h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(d) The Project Sponsor was Mr K Porter, Deputy Commissioner (Administration). (e) Initial reports outlining findings and recommendations relating to all portfolios and directorates within the Police Service have been completed. However, further work and assessment is still being conducted. (f) N/A (g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table. (h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(e) Initial reports outlining findings and recommendations relating to all portfolios and directorates within the Police Service have been completed. However, further work and assessment is still being conducted. (f) N/A (g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table. (h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(f) N/A (g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table. (h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table. (h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(c) if yes, when was this review undertaken and when was it completed; (d) who headed the review; (e) has the report been completed in relation to this review; (f) if not, why not; (g) if yes, will the Minister table a copy of that report; and (h) how many officers have been freed up and returned to front line duties as a direct result of this review?
(d) who headed the review; (e) has the report been completed in relation to this review; (f) if not, why not; (g) if yes, will the Minister table a copy of that report; and (h) how many officers have been freed up and returned to front line duties as a direct result of this review?
(e) has the report been completed in relation to this review; (f) if not, why not; (g) if yes, will the Minister table a copy of that report; and (h) how many officers have been freed up and returned to front line duties as a direct result of this review?
(f) if not, why not; (g) if yes, will the Minister table a copy of that report; and (h) how many officers have been freed up and returned to front line duties as a direct result of this review?
(g) if yes, will the Minister table a copy of that report; and (h) how many officers have been freed up and returned to front line duties as a direct result of this review?
(h) how many officers have been freed up and returned to front line duties as a direct result of this review?
(b) N/A (c) The Administration Functions Review commenced in May 2001. (d) The Project Sponsor was Mr K Porter, Deputy Commissioner (Administration). (e) Initial reports outlining findings and recommendations relating to all portfolios and directorates within the Police Service have been completed. However, further work and assessment is still being conducted. (f) N/A (g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table. (h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(c) The Administration Functions Review commenced in May 2001. (d) The Project Sponsor was Mr K Porter, Deputy Commissioner (Administration). (e) Initial reports outlining findings and recommendations relating to all portfolios and directorates within the Police Service have been completed. However, further work and assessment is still being conducted. (f) N/A (g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table. (h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(d) The Project Sponsor was Mr K Porter, Deputy Commissioner (Administration). (e) Initial reports outlining findings and recommendations relating to all portfolios and directorates within the Police Service have been completed. However, further work and assessment is still being conducted. (f) N/A (g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table. (h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(e) Initial reports outlining findings and recommendations relating to all portfolios and directorates within the Police Service have been completed. However, further work and assessment is still being conducted. (f) N/A (g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table. (h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(f) N/A (g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table. (h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table. (h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
28 June 2002
Responded by
Minister for Police and Emergency Services
Response time
38 days
(a) The WA Police Service has undertaken an Administration Functions Review (AFR) to ensure the appropriateness of current administrative structures, the efficient delivery of services both internally and to the community of Western Australia, and to maximise valuable resources.
(b) N/A
(c) The Administration Functions Review commenced in May 2001.
(d) The Project Sponsor was Mr K Porter, Deputy Commissioner (Administration).
(e) Initial reports outlining findings and recommendations relating to all portfolios and directorates within the Police Service have been completed. However, further work and assessment is still being conducted.
(f) N/A
(g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table.
(h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
(b) N/A
(c) The Administration Functions Review commenced in May 2001.
(d) The Project Sponsor was Mr K Porter, Deputy Commissioner (Administration).
(e) Initial reports outlining findings and recommendations relating to all portfolios and directorates within the Police Service have been completed. However, further work and assessment is still being conducted.
(f) N/A
(g) The initial AFR reports are considered to be working documents for senior executive assessment and, as such, are inappropriate to table.
(h) Forty-eight (48) positions have been reallocated to front line policing as a direct result of the Administrative Functions Review.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.