A WA parliamentary question seeks information about the TRACKFAST program, including funding, reasons for lack of product trials, and the number of applications received. The response indicates the program was unfunded and faced liability issues.

AnsweredQoN 320Legislative Assembly
Asked
16 August 2005
Portfolio
Premier

QuestionView source ↗

(b) how much funding has been provided for this program on an annual basis since its inception; (c) why is it that ‘no products and technological innovations have been trialled in government agencies through the TRACKFAST program’; and (d) how many applications have been received to trial products and technological innovations through the TRACKFAST program?
(c) why is it that ‘no products and technological innovations have been trialled in government agencies through the TRACKFAST program’; and (d) how many applications have been received to trial products and technological innovations through the TRACKFAST program?
(d) how many applications have been received to trial products and technological innovations through the TRACKFAST program?
(b) No funding was provided for this program. (c) The program was run as a trial. Trialling of products and services in Government Agencies proved problematic due to public liability and insurance issues. (d) Twelve.
(c) The program was run as a trial. Trialling of products and services in Government Agencies proved problematic due to public liability and insurance issues. (d) Twelve.
(d) Twelve.

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
14 September 2005
Response time
29 days
(a) Trackfast was advertised in June 2002 and trialled until December 2002.
(b) No funding was provided for this program.
(c) The program was run as a trial. Trialling of products and services in Government Agencies proved problematic due to public liability and insurance issues.
(d) Twelve.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more