❓ Hon. Norman Moore requests the Attorney General to table documents related to legal funding for the appeals of Mr. D. Beamish and Mr. A. Mallard, and inquires about the Attorney General's knowledge of the Mrs. P. Lawrence murder cold case review. The Attorney General agrees to table the requested documents but has not read the cold case review.
AnsweredQoN 972Legislative Council
Asked
26 October 2006
Member
Portfolio
parliamentary secretary representing the Attorney General
QuestionView source ↗
MALLARD AND BEAMISH CASES - LEGAL FEES
(1) Will the Attorney General table the request for funding from Blake Dawson Waldron for the appeal by Mr D. Beamish and the letter of agreement from the government; and, if not, why not? (2) Will the Attorney General table a letter from Clayton Utz to the Solicitor General dated 9 June 2005 about the funding application for Mr A. Mallard’s High Court appeal; and, if not, why not? (3) Has the Attorney General read the cold case review report into the murder of Mrs P. Lawrence or been provided with a more substantial briefing than the limited public statements from the police? Hon SUE ELLERY
(1) Will the Attorney General table the request for funding from Blake Dawson Waldron for the appeal by Mr D. Beamish and the letter of agreement from the government; and, if not, why not? (2) Will the Attorney General table a letter from Clayton Utz to the Solicitor General dated 9 June 2005 about the funding application for Mr A. Mallard’s High Court appeal; and, if not, why not? (3) Has the Attorney General read the cold case review report into the murder of Mrs P. Lawrence or been provided with a more substantial briefing than the limited public statements from the police? Hon SUE ELLERY
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) Yes. (3) No. I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
(2) Will the Attorney General table a letter from Clayton Utz to the Solicitor General dated 9 June 2005 about the funding application for Mr A. Mallard’s High Court appeal; and, if not, why not? (3) Has the Attorney General read the cold case review report into the murder of Mrs P. Lawrence or been provided with a more substantial briefing than the limited public statements from the police? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) Yes. (3) No. I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
(3) Has the Attorney General read the cold case review report into the murder of Mrs P. Lawrence or been provided with a more substantial briefing than the limited public statements from the police? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) Yes. (3) No. I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
Hon SUE ELLERY replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) Yes. (3) No. I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) Yes. (3) No. I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
(1)-(2) Yes. (3) No. I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
(3) No. I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
[See paper 2169.]
(2) Will the Attorney General table a letter from Clayton Utz to the Solicitor General dated 9 June 2005 about the funding application for Mr A. Mallard’s High Court appeal; and, if not, why not? (3) Has the Attorney General read the cold case review report into the murder of Mrs P. Lawrence or been provided with a more substantial briefing than the limited public statements from the police? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) Yes. (3) No. I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
(3) Has the Attorney General read the cold case review report into the murder of Mrs P. Lawrence or been provided with a more substantial briefing than the limited public statements from the police? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) Yes. (3) No. I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
Hon SUE ELLERY replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) Yes. (3) No. I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)-(2) Yes. (3) No. I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
(1)-(2) Yes. (3) No. I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
(3) No. I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
I table the documents. [See paper 2169.]
[See paper 2169.]
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.