❓ Hon. Helen Morton questions the South West Development Commission regarding employee contracts and performance reviews, specifically concerning employees earning $150,000 and $200,000. The response indicates limited instances of contracts and performance reviews meeting the specified criteria.
AnsweredQoN 2859Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
15 March 2006
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Peel and the South West
Response time
127 days
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
(c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
South West Development Commission (1) (a) - (c) Nil (2) (a) 1 (b) - (c) Nil (3) (a) - (c) Nil (4) (a) 1 (b) - (c) Nil
(c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
South West Development Commission (1) (a) - (c) Nil (2) (a) 1 (b) - (c) Nil (3) (a) - (c) Nil (4) (a) 1 (b) - (c) Nil
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.