❓ A parliamentary question addresses compensation for landowners affected by the Shreeve Road Reserve extension in Canning Vale. The Minister confirms market valuation reimbursement and landowner notification, but declines to table the proposal due to ongoing deliberations.
AnsweredQoN 309Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
Regarding the proposal to compensate landowners affected by the extension of Shreeve Road Reserve, Canning Vale - (a) what is the proposed method of compensation for landowners affected by the extension of Shreeve Road Reserve; (b) will landowners be reimbursed at market valuation for the land they give up; (c) if not, why not; (d) are the landowners being informed on developments that affect their land; (e) will there be reimbursement for land taken for the buffer, or fringe, land around the extended reserve; (f) will the Minister table the proposal for the extension of Shreeve Road Reserve, Canning Vale; and (g) if not, why not? Answered on 20 September 2000 The Minister
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
20 September 2000
Response time
42 days
(a) Landowners affected by the core wetland area in the Shreeve Road Precinct will, upon further subdivision or development of their land, be required to cede that core area. It will be added to the existing Reserve 38134. A method of compensation is proposed in Amendment No. 478 to the City of Gosnells Town Planning Scheme No. 1. Landowners affected by the fringe area to the wetland again will be required to cede that fringe area, upon subdivision or development. Each landowner is required to provide a portion of their landholding for public open space, as determined by Amendment No. 478 and the subdivision process. Should the area of the wetland fringe, on a particular landholding, exceed the portion of that same landholding required for open space, then a payment will be made for the balance of that fringe area. (b) Yes. (c) Not applicable. (d) Yes. I am advised that the Department of Environmental Protection and the City of Gosnells have or will comply with all of their statutory obligations in this regard. (e) Yes, see above. (f) No. (g) The Amendment is still within the deliberation process and it is not proper for me to table the documents at this time. However, I will when the process is completed.
(b) will landowners be reimbursed at market valuation for the land they give up; (c) if not, why not; (d) are the landowners being informed on developments that affect their land; (e) will there be reimbursement for land taken for the buffer, or fringe, land around the extended reserve; (f) will the Minister table the proposal for the extension of Shreeve Road Reserve, Canning Vale; and (g) if not, why not?
(c) if not, why not; (d) are the landowners being informed on developments that affect their land; (e) will there be reimbursement for land taken for the buffer, or fringe, land around the extended reserve; (f) will the Minister table the proposal for the extension of Shreeve Road Reserve, Canning Vale; and (g) if not, why not?
(d) are the landowners being informed on developments that affect their land; (e) will there be reimbursement for land taken for the buffer, or fringe, land around the extended reserve; (f) will the Minister table the proposal for the extension of Shreeve Road Reserve, Canning Vale; and (g) if not, why not?
(e) will there be reimbursement for land taken for the buffer, or fringe, land around the extended reserve; (f) will the Minister table the proposal for the extension of Shreeve Road Reserve, Canning Vale; and (g) if not, why not?
(f) will the Minister table the proposal for the extension of Shreeve Road Reserve, Canning Vale; and (g) if not, why not?
(g) if not, why not?
(b) will landowners be reimbursed at market valuation for the land they give up; (c) if not, why not; (d) are the landowners being informed on developments that affect their land; (e) will there be reimbursement for land taken for the buffer, or fringe, land around the extended reserve; (f) will the Minister table the proposal for the extension of Shreeve Road Reserve, Canning Vale; and (g) if not, why not?
(c) if not, why not; (d) are the landowners being informed on developments that affect their land; (e) will there be reimbursement for land taken for the buffer, or fringe, land around the extended reserve; (f) will the Minister table the proposal for the extension of Shreeve Road Reserve, Canning Vale; and (g) if not, why not?
(d) are the landowners being informed on developments that affect their land; (e) will there be reimbursement for land taken for the buffer, or fringe, land around the extended reserve; (f) will the Minister table the proposal for the extension of Shreeve Road Reserve, Canning Vale; and (g) if not, why not?
(e) will there be reimbursement for land taken for the buffer, or fringe, land around the extended reserve; (f) will the Minister table the proposal for the extension of Shreeve Road Reserve, Canning Vale; and (g) if not, why not?
(f) will the Minister table the proposal for the extension of Shreeve Road Reserve, Canning Vale; and (g) if not, why not?
(g) if not, why not?
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.